» Articles » PMID: 38064247

Digital Cognitive Assessment Tests for Older Adults: Systematic Literature Review

Overview
Date 2023 Dec 8
PMID 38064247
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The global health pandemic has affected the increasing older adult population, especially those with mental illnesses. It is necessary to prevent cases of cognitive impairment in adults early on, and this requires the support of information and communication technologies for evaluating and training cognitive functions. This can be achieved through computer applications designed for cognitive assessment.

Objective: In this review, we aimed to assess the state of the art of the current platforms and digital test applications for cognitive evaluation, with a focus on older adults.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on 3 databases (Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus) to retrieve recent articles on the applications of digital tests for cognitive assessment and analyze them based on the methodology used. Four research questions were considered. Through the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) methodology, following the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 20 articles were finally reviewed.

Results: Some gaps and trends were identified regarding the types of digital applications and technologies used, the evaluated effects on cognitive domains, and the psychometric parameters and personal characteristics considered for validation.

Conclusions: Computerized tests (similar to paper-and-pencil tests) and test batteries (on computers, tablets, or web platforms) were the predominant types of assessments. Initial studies with simulators, virtual environments, and daily-life activity games were also conducted. Diverse validation methods and psychometric properties were observed; however, there was a lack of evaluations that involved specific populations with diverse education levels, cultures, and degrees of technology acceptance. In addition, these evaluations should consider emotional and usability aspects.

Citing Articles

A New Computer-Based Cognitive Measure for Early Detection of Dementia Risk (Japan Cognitive Function Test): Validation Study.

Shimada H, Doi T, Tsutsumimoto K, Makino K, Harada K, Tomida K J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e59015.

PMID: 39951718 PMC: 11888094. DOI: 10.2196/59015.


The Potential of Automated Assessment of Cognitive Function Using Non-Neuroimaging Data: A Systematic Review.

Babatope E, Ramirez-Acosta A, Avila-Funes J, Garcia-Vazquez M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685528 PMC: 11642063. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237068.


Validation and convergent validity of the Boston cognitive assessment (BOCA) in an Italian population: a comparative study with the Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) in Alzheimer's disease spectrum.

Padovani A, Caratozzolo S, Galli A, Crosani L, Zampini S, Cosseddu M Neurol Sci. 2024; 46(2):697-704.

PMID: 39313687 PMC: 11772383. DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07775-3.


Tablet-Based Cognitive and Eye Movement Measures as Accessible Tools for Schizophrenia Assessment: Multisite Usability Study.

Morita K, Miura K, Toyomaki A, Makinodan M, Ohi K, Hashimoto N JMIR Ment Health. 2024; 11:e56668.

PMID: 38815257 PMC: 11176872. DOI: 10.2196/56668.


The Real-World Usability, Feasibility, and Performance Distributions of Deploying a Digital Toolbox of Computerized Assessments to Remotely Evaluate Brain Health: Development and Usability Study.

Attarha M, Mahncke H, Merzenich M JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e53623.

PMID: 38739916 PMC: 11130778. DOI: 10.2196/53623.


References
1.
Kostering L, Schmidt C, Weiller C, Kaller C . Analyses of Rule Breaks and Errors During Planning in Computerized Tower Tasks: Insights From Neurological Patients. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016; 31(7):738-753. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acw059. View

2.
Nieto A, Hernandez-Rodriguez E, Hernandez-Torres A, Velasco Rodriguez-Solis P, Hess-Medler S, Machado-Fernandez A . [Alternate form of the test de aprendizaje verbal España-Complutense (TAVEC)]. Rev Neurol. 2014; 58(9):389-95. View

3.
Fuentes P, Albala C . An update on aging and dementia in Chile. Dement Neuropsychol. 2017; 8(4):317-322. PMC: 5619178. DOI: 10.1590/S1980-57642014DN84000003. View

4.
Chan J, Yau S, Kwok T, Tsoi K . Diagnostic performance of digital cognitive tests for the identification of MCI and dementia: A systematic review. Ageing Res Rev. 2021; 72:101506. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101506. View

5.
Aslam R, Bates V, Dundar Y, Hounsome J, Richardson M, Krishan A . A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of automated tests for cognitive impairment. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018; 33(4):561-575. PMC: 5887872. DOI: 10.1002/gps.4852. View