» Articles » PMID: 38062065

Infection of Wild-caught Wood Mice (Apodemus Sylvaticus) and Yellow-necked Mice (A. Flavicollis) with Tick-borne Encephalitis Virus

Abstract

The distribution of tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is expanding to Western European countries, including the Netherlands, but the contribution of different rodent species to the transmission of TBEV is poorly understood. We investigated whether two species of wild rodents native to the Netherlands, the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus and the yellow-necked mouse Apodemus flavicollis, differ in their relative susceptibility to experimental infection with TBEV. Wild-caught individuals were inoculated subcutaneously with the classical European subtype of TBEV (Neudoerfl) or with TBEV-NL, a genetically divergent TBEV strain from the Netherlands. Mice were euthanised and necropsied between 3 and 21 days post-inoculation. None of the mice showed clinical signs or died during the experimental period. Nevertheless, TBEV RNA was detected up to 21 days in the blood of both mouse species and TBEV was also isolated from the brain of some mice. Moreover, no differences in infection rates between virus strains and mouse species were found in blood, spleen, or liver samples. Our results suggest that the wood mouse and the yellow-necked mouse may equally contribute to the transmission cycle of TBEV in the Netherlands. Future experimental infection studies that include feeding ticks will help elucidate the relative importance of viraemic transmission in the epidemiology of TBEV.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and genotype analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. in nine species of wild rodents in China.

Gao Z, Wang H, Li J, Song Y, Hou Q, Qin S Parasite. 2025; 32:19.

PMID: 40053847 PMC: 11888585. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2025012.


Tick-borne viruses: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and animal models.

Yu K, Park S One Health. 2024; 19:100903.

PMID: 39391267 PMC: 11465198. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100903.


Prevalence and subtypes of in wild rodents from three provinces in China.

Gao Z, Wang H, Hou Q, Qin Y, Yang X, Zhao Q Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1432741.

PMID: 39071781 PMC: 11274486. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1432741.

References
1.
Schwaiger M, Cassinotti P . Development of a quantitative real-time RT-PCR assay with internal control for the laboratory detection of tick borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) RNA. J Clin Virol. 2003; 27(2):136-45. DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(02)00168-3. View

2.
Rosa R, Tagliapietra V, Manica M, Arnoldi D, Hauffe H, Rossi C . Changes in host densities and co-feeding pattern efficiently predict tick-borne encephalitis hazard in an endemic focus in northern Italy. Int J Parasitol. 2019; 49(10):779-787. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2019.05.006. View

3.
Randolph S . The shifting landscape of tick-borne zoonoses: tick-borne encephalitis and Lyme borreliosis in Europe. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001; 356(1411):1045-56. PMC: 1088499. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2001.0893. View

4.
Kozuch O, Chunikhin S, Gresikova M, Nosek J, Kurenkov V, Lysy J . Experimental characteristics of viraemia caused by two strains of tick-borne encephalitis virus in small rodents. Acta Virol. 1981; 25(4):219-24. View

5.
Sakai M, Muto M, Hirano M, Kariwa H, Yoshii K . Virulence of tick-borne encephalitis virus is associated with intact conformational viral RNA structures in the variable region of the 3'-UTR. Virus Res. 2015; 203:36-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.03.006. View