» Articles » PMID: 38053082

3 L Split-dose Polyethylene Glycol is Superior to 2 L Polyethylene Glycol in Colonoscopic Bowel Preparation in Relatively High-BMI (≥ 24 Kg/m) Individuals: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2023 Dec 5
PMID 38053082
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Whether body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for poor bowel preparation is controversial, and the optimal bowel preparation regimen for people with a high BMI is unclear.

Methods: We prospectively included 710 individuals with high BMIs (≥ 24 kg/m) who were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy from January to November 2021 at 7 hospitals. Participants were randomly allocated into 3 L split-dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) group (n=353) and 2 L PEG group (n=357). The primary outcome was the rate of adequate bowel preparation, and the secondary outcomes included Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, polyp detection rate, cecal intubation rate, and adverse reactions during bowel preparation. Furthermore, we did exploratory subgroup analyses for adequate bowel preparation.

Results: After enrollment, 15 individuals didn't undergo colonoscopy, finally 345 participants took 3 L split-dose PEG regimen, and 350 participants took 2 L PEG regimen for colonoscopic bowel preparation. 3 L split-dose PEG regimen was superior to 2 L PEG regimen in the rate of adequate bowel preparation (81.2% vs. 74.9%, P = 0.045), BBPS score (6.71±1.15 vs. 6.37±1.31, P < 0.001), and the rate of polyp detection (62.0% vs. 52.9%, P = 0.015). The cecal intubation rate was similar in both groups (99.7%). Regarding adverse reactions, individuals were more likely to feel nausea in the 3 L PEG group (30.9% vs. 19.3%; P = 0.001); however, the degree was mild. In the subgroup analysis for adequate bowel preparation, 3 L split-dose PEG regimen performed better than 2 L PEG regimen in the overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m ) (P = 0.006) and individuals with constipation (P = 0.044), while no significant differences were observed in relatively normal (BMI 24-24.9 kg/m) (P = 0.593) and obese individuals (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m) (P = 0.715).

Conclusions: 3 L split-dose PEG regimen is superior to 2 L PEG regimen for colonoscopic Bowel Preparation in relatively high-BMI individuals, especially overweight individuals (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m ).

Trial Registration: This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ChiCTR2000039068). The date of first registration, 15/10/2020, http://www.chictr.org.cn.

Citing Articles

Comparing the bowel cleansing efficacy between sodium picosulfate vs. 2L polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution for colonoscopy: a prospective observational study.

Shan J, Su Y, Luo D, Jiang L, Zhang C, Liu Y BMC Gastroenterol. 2025; 25(1):164.

PMID: 40075296 PMC: 11899895. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-025-03707-3.


Oral sulfate solution versus polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Liu X, Yu W, Liu J, Liu Q Tech Coloproctol. 2024; 28(1):99.

PMID: 39138737 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-024-02981-9.


Prospective, randomized study comparing two different regimens of split-dose polyethylene glycol and their effect on endoscopic outcomes.

Abou Zeid J, Hallit S, Akiki B, Abou Zeid Z, Yazbeck C BMC Gastroenterol. 2024; 24(1):132.

PMID: 38609900 PMC: 11010337. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-024-03212-z.

References
1.
Kaminski M, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, Bretthauer M, Rees C, Dekker E . Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5(3):309-334. PMC: 5415221. DOI: 10.1177/2050640617700014. View

2.
Zhou B . Predictive values of body mass index and waist circumference for risk factors of certain related diseases in Chinese adults--study on optimal cut-off points of body mass index and waist circumference in Chinese adults. Biomed Environ Sci. 2002; 15(1):83-96. View

3.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

4.
Borg B, Gupta N, Zuckerman G, Banerjee B, Gyawali C . Impact of obesity on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7(6):670-5. PMC: 4151157. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.02.014. View

5.
Johnson D, Barkun A, Cohen L, Dominitz J, Kaltenbach T, Martel M . Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014; 147(4):903-24. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.07.002. View