» Articles » PMID: 38052017

Racial Disparities in Surgical Outcomes After Mastectomy in 223 000 Female Breast Cancer Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer mortality and treatment differ across racial groups. It remains unclear whether such disparities are also reflected in perioperative outcomes of breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy.

Study Design: The authors reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database (2008-2021) to identify female patients who underwent mastectomy for oncological purposes. The outcomes were stratified by five racial groups (white, Black/African American, Asian, American Indian/Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander) and included 30-day mortality, reoperation, readmission, surgical and medical complications, and non-home discharge.

Results: The study population included 222 947 patients, 68% ( n =151 522) of whom were white, 11% ( n =23 987) Black/African American, 5% ( n =11 217) Asian, 0.5% ( n =1198) American Indian/Alaska Native, and 0.5% ( n =1018) Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. While 136 690 (61%) patients underwent partial mastectomy, 54 490 (24%) and 31 767 (14%) women received simple and radical mastectomy, respectively. Overall, adverse events occurred in 17 222 (7.7%) patients, the largest portion of which were surgical complications ( n =7246; 3.3%). Multivariable analysis revealed that being of Asian race was protective against perioperative complications [odds ratio (OR)=0.71; P <0.001], whereas American Indian/Alaska Native women were most vulnerable to the complication occurrence (OR=1.41; P <0.001). Black/African American patients had a significantly lower risk of medical (OR=0.59; P <0.001) and surgical complications (OR=0.60; P <0.001) after partial and radical mastectomy, respectively, their likelihood of readmission (OR=1.14; P =0.045) following partial mastectomy was significantly increased.

Conclusion: The authors identified American Indian/Alaska Native women as particularly vulnerable to complications following mastectomy. Asian patients experienced the lowest rate of complications in the perioperative period. The authors' analyses revealed comparable confounder-adjusted outcomes following partial and complete mastectomy between Black and white races. Their findings call for care equalization in the field of breast cancer surgery.

Citing Articles

Breast Implant Removal Surgery: A Data-driven Look at Growing Trends.

Knoedler S, Alfertshofer M, Rams D, Matar D, Knoedler L, Sofo G Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(12):e6402.

PMID: 39712382 PMC: 11661728. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006402.


Perioperative safety of risk-reducing mastectomy.

Knoedler S, Diatta F, Kasparbauer F, Knoedler L, Kim B, Pomahac B Br J Cancer. 2024; 131(11):1721-1723.

PMID: 39501091 PMC: 11589771. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02897-z.

References
1.
Roberts S, Rosen C, Keele L, Kaufman E, Wirtalla C, Finn C . Association of Established Primary Care Use With Postoperative Mortality Following Emergency General Surgery Procedures. JAMA Surg. 2023; 158(10):1023-1030. PMC: 10357361. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.2742. View

2.
Blankensteijn L, Sparenberg S, Crystal D, Ibrahim A, Lee B, Lin S . Racial Disparities in Outcomes of Reconstructive Breast Surgery: An Analysis of 51,362 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020; 36(8):592-599. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713174. View

3.
Gu J, Groot G, Boden C, Busch A, Holtslander L, Lim H . Review of Factors Influencing Women's Choice of Mastectomy Versus Breast Conserving Therapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Clin Breast Cancer. 2018; 18(4):e539-e554. DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.12.013. View

4.
Zelken J, Cheng M . Asian Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 3(11):e555. PMC: 4727707. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000528. View

5.
Yu A, Thomas S, DiLalla G, Greenup R, Hwang E, Hyslop T . Disease characteristics and mortality among Asian women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2021; 128(5):1024-1037. PMC: 8837687. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34015. View