» Articles » PMID: 38050158

Health Services Under Pressure: a Scoping Review and Development of a Taxonomy of Adaptive Strategies

Overview
Journal BMJ Qual Saf
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 Dec 5
PMID 38050158
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The objective of this review was to develop a taxonomy of pressures experienced by health services and an accompanying taxonomy of strategies for adapting in response to these pressures. The taxonomies were developed from a review of observational studies directly assessing care delivered in a variety of clinical environments.

Design: In the first phase, a scoping review of the relevant literature was conducted. In the second phase, pressures and strategies were systematically coded from the included papers, and categorised.

Data Sources: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Scopus) and reference lists from recent reviews of the resilient healthcare literature.

Eligibility Criteria: Studies were included from the resilient healthcare literature, which used descriptive methodologies to directly assess a clinical environment. The studies were required to contain strategies for managing under pressure.

Results: 5402 potential articles were identified with 17 papers meeting the inclusion criteria. The principal source of pressure described in the studies was the demand for care exceeding capacity (ie, the resources available), which in turn led to difficult working conditions and problems with system functioning. Strategies for responding to pressures were categorised into anticipatory and on-the-day adaptations. Anticipatory strategies included strategies for increasing resources, controlling demand and plans for managing the workload (efficiency strategies, forward planning, monitoring and co-ordination strategies and staff support initiatives). On-the-day adaptations were categorised into: flexing the use of existing resources, prioritising demand and adapting ways of working (leadership, teamwork and communication strategies).

Conclusions: The review has culminated in an empirically based taxonomy of pressures and an accompanying taxonomy of strategies for adapting in response to these pressures. The taxonomies could help clinicians and managers to optimise how they respond to pressures and may be used as the basis for training programmes and future research evaluating the impact of different strategies.

Citing Articles

Detecting and responding to deterioration of a baby during labour: surveys of maternity professionals to inform co-design and implementation of a new standardised approach.

VAN DER Scheer J, Blott M, Dixon-Woods M, Olsson A, Moxey J, Kelly S BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e084578.

PMID: 40050068 PMC: 11887309. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084578.


Geriatric evaluation and management inpatients spend little time participating in physically, cognitively or socially meaningful activity: a time-motion analysis.

Jolliffe L, Collyer T, Sun K, Done L, Barber S, Callisaya M Age Ageing. 2025; 54(3).

PMID: 40037904 PMC: 11879543. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afaf043.


Enhancing patient safety and risk management through clinical pathways in oncology.

Milanesi M, Fiorito R, Caloccia L, Guglielmetti C, Giganti G, Andreasi S BMJ Open Qual. 2025; 14(1).

PMID: 39875160 PMC: 11781099. DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003012.


Emergency Care for Refugee Patients at Suceava Hospital, Romania: Challenges and Insights from the First Year of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict.

Tataranu E, Ion L, Nemtoi A, Filip F, Axinte S, Axinte R Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 39857165 PMC: 11765318. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13020138.


How do staff work in NHS hospital operations management meetings to support resilience in everyday service delivery? A qualitative study.

Sutton L, Tarrant C, Willars J, Coats T, Simmonds M, Mclean D BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):113.

PMID: 39833860 PMC: 11749087. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12229-3.


References
1.
Carayon P, Schoofs Hundt A, Karsh B, Gurses A, Alvarado C, Smith M . Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15 Suppl 1:i50-8. PMC: 2464868. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.015842. View

2.
Scott J, Lin Y, Ntakiyiruta G, Mutabazi Z, Davis W, Morris M . Contextual Challenges to Safe Surgery in a Resource-limited Setting: A Multicenter, Multiprofessional Qualitative Study. Ann Surg. 2017; 267(3):461-467. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002193. View

3.
Colquhoun H, Levac D, OBrien K, Straus S, Tricco A, Perrier L . Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014; 67(12):1291-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013. View

4.
Hybinette K, Harenstam K, Ekstedt M . A First-line management team's strategies for sustaining resilience in a specialised intensive care unit-a qualitative observational study. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(3):e040358. PMC: 7970205. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040358. View

5.
Kagwanja N, Waithaka D, Nzinga J, Tsofa B, Boga M, Leli H . Shocks, stress and everyday health system resilience: experiences from the Kenyan coast. Health Policy Plan. 2020; 35(5):522-535. PMC: 7225571. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa002. View