» Articles » PMID: 38049431

Microplastic Burden in Marine Benthic Invertebrates Depends on Species Traits and Feeding Ecology Within Biogeographical Provinces

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 Dec 4
PMID 38049431
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The microplastic body burden of marine animals is often assumed to reflect levels of environmental contamination, yet variations in feeding ecology and regional trait expression could also affect a species' risk of contaminant uptake. Here, we explore the global inventory of individual microplastic body burden for invertebrate species inhabiting marine sediments across 16 biogeographic provinces. We show that individual microplastic body burden in benthic invertebrates cannot be fully explained by absolute levels of microplastic contamination in the environment, because interspecific differences in behaviour and feeding ecology strongly determine microplastic uptake. Our analyses also indicate a degree of species-specific particle selectivity; likely associated with feeding biology. Highest microplastic burden occurs in the Yellow and Mediterranean Seas and, contrary to expectation, amongst omnivores, predators, and deposit feeders rather than suspension feeding species. Our findings highlight the inadequacy of microplastic uptake risk assessments based on inventories of environmental contamination alone, and the need to understand how species behaviour and trait expression covary with microplastic contamination.

Citing Articles

Microplastics enhance the prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes in mariculture sediments by enriching host bacteria and promoting horizontal gene transfer.

Liu Y, Liu L, Wang X, Shao M, Wei Z, Wang L Eco Environ Health. 2025; 4(1):100136.

PMID: 40052062 PMC: 11883372. DOI: 10.1016/j.eehl.2025.100136.


Bottom-Feeders Eat Their Fiber: Ingestion of Anthropogenic Microdebris by Antarctic Deep-Sea Invertebrates Depends on Feeding Ecology.

Stefanelli-Silva G, Friedemann P, Rocha de Moraes B, Ando R, Campos L, Petti M Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(50):22355-22367.

PMID: 39568238 PMC: 11656696. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.4c09487.

References
1.
Huang Y, Li W, Gao J, Wang F, Yang W, Han L . Effect of microplastics on ecosystem functioning: Microbial nitrogen removal mediated by benthic invertebrates. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 754:142133. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142133. View

2.
Qiao R, Deng Y, Zhang S, Wolosker M, Zhu Q, Ren H . Accumulation of different shapes of microplastics initiates intestinal injury and gut microbiota dysbiosis in the gut of zebrafish. Chemosphere. 2019; 236:124334. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.065. View

3.
Van Colen C, Moereels L, Vanhove B, Vrielinck H, Moens T . The biological plastic pump: Evidence from a local case study using blue mussel and infaunal benthic communities. Environ Pollut. 2020; 274:115825. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115825. View

4.
Gray A, Weinstein J . Size- and shape-dependent effects of microplastic particles on adult daggerblade grass shrimp (Palaemonetes pugio). Environ Toxicol Chem. 2017; 36(11):3074-3080. DOI: 10.1002/etc.3881. View

5.
Lau W, Shiran Y, Bailey R, Cook E, Stuchtey M, Koskella J . Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science. 2020; 369(6510):1455-1461. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba9475. View