» Articles » PMID: 3803414

Pharmacokinetics of Verapamil in Patients with Hypertension

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1986 Jan 1
PMID 3803414
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Twelve hypertensive patients (WHO Stage I-II) were given oral verapamil (Isoptin) b.d. or t.d.s. as long-term treatment. The pharmacokinetics of verapamil and norverapamil were studied both after single and b.d. and t.d.s. doses of verapamil 240, 360 or 480 mg daily adjusted according to the blood pressure response. The apparent oral clearance of verapamil was decreased after both the twice and thrice daily dosage regimens (1.38 and 1.841/min, respectively) as compared to the single dose (4.391/min). The plasma half-life of verapamil was increased from 3.34 h (single dose) to 4.65 h (b.i.d.). Decreased elimination of norverapamil was also found after multiple doses of verapamil, as shown by an increase in the adjusted AUC of norverapamil (adjusted to a verapamil dose of 80 mg), namely from 574.9 h X ng X ml-1 (single dose) to 1172 h X ng X ml-1 (b.d.) and to 841 h X ng X ml-1 (t.d.s.). The plasma half-life of norverapamil increase from 5.68 h to 7.34 h during twice daily dosing. During thrice daily verapamil, no increase in plasma half-life was found either for verapamil or norverapamil, probably due to the relatively short sampling time (6 h). The plasma concentration of verapamil and the reduction in supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure were correlated. The mean decrease in supine systolic blood pressure was 5.8 mm Hg per 100 ng verapamil/ml plasma, and for diastolic pressure 2.9 mm Hg per 100 ng verapamil/ml plasma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Concentration-effect analysis of antihypertensive drug response. Focus on calcium antagonists.

Donnelly R, Elliott H, MEREDITH P Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994; 26(6):472-85.

PMID: 8070220 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199426060-00005.


Calcium absorption and excretion in patients treated with verapamil.

Sjoden G, Rosenqvist M, Kriegholm E, Haglund K Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987; 24(3):367-71.

PMID: 3663451 PMC: 1386259. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03182.x.


Verapamil. An updated review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in hypertension.

McTavish D, Sorkin E Drugs. 1989; 38(1):19-76.

PMID: 2670511 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198938010-00003.


Verapamil disposition and cardiovascular effects in elderly patients after single intravenous and oral doses.

Carosella L, Menichelli P, Alimenti M, Zuccala G, Gemma A, Cocchi A Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989; 3(3):417-25.

PMID: 2487538 DOI: 10.1007/BF01858113.


Evaluation of potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between verapamil and propranolol in normal subjects.

Murdoch D, Thomson G, Thompson G, Murray G, Brodie M, McInnes G Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1991; 31(3):323-32.

PMID: 2054272 PMC: 1368359. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb05536.x.


References
1.
Gould B, Mann S, Kieso H, Subramanian V, Raftery E . The 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure profile with verapamil. Circulation. 1982; 65(1):22-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.65.1.22. View

2.
Anavekar S, Christophidis N, Louis W, Doyle A . Verapamil in the treatment of hypertension. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1981; 3(2):287-92. DOI: 10.1097/00005344-198103000-00007. View

3.
McAllister Jr R, Kirsten E . The pharmacology of verapamil. IV. Kinetic and dynamic effects after single intravenous and oral doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1982; 31(4):418-26. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1982.54. View

4.
Halperin A, Gross K, ROGERS J, Cubeddu L . Verapamil and propranolol in essential hypertension. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1984; 36(6):750-8. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1984.253. View

5.
Leonetti G, Sala C, Bianchini C, Terzoli L, Zanchetti A . Antihypertensive and renal effects of orally administered verapamil. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1980; 18(5):375-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF00636788. View