» Articles » PMID: 38031481

Translating Ethical and Quality Principles for the Effective, Safe and Fair Development, Deployment and Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Healthcare

Abstract

Objective: The complexity and rapid pace of development of algorithmic technologies pose challenges for their regulation and oversight in healthcare settings. We sought to improve our institution's approach to evaluation and governance of algorithmic technologies used in clinical care and operations by creating an Implementation Guide that standardizes evaluation criteria so that local oversight is performed in an objective fashion.

Materials And Methods: Building on a framework that applies key ethical and quality principles (clinical value and safety, fairness and equity, usability and adoption, transparency and accountability, and regulatory compliance), we created concrete guidelines for evaluating algorithmic technologies at our institution.

Results: An Implementation Guide articulates evaluation criteria used during review of algorithmic technologies and details what evidence supports the implementation of ethical and quality principles for trustworthy health AI. Application of the processes described in the Implementation Guide can lead to algorithms that are safer as well as more effective, fair, and equitable upon implementation, as illustrated through 4 examples of technologies at different phases of the algorithmic lifecycle that underwent evaluation at our academic medical center.

Discussion: By providing clear descriptions/definitions of evaluation criteria and embedding them within standardized processes, we streamlined oversight processes and educated communities using and developing algorithmic technologies within our institution.

Conclusions: We developed a scalable, adaptable framework for translating principles into evaluation criteria and specific requirements that support trustworthy implementation of algorithmic technologies in patient care and healthcare operations.

Citing Articles

AI for IMPACTS Framework for Evaluating the Long-Term Real-World Impacts of AI-Powered Clinician Tools: Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.

Jacob C, Brasier N, Laurenzi E, Heuss S, Mougiakakou S, Coltekin A J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e67485.

PMID: 39909417 PMC: 11840377. DOI: 10.2196/67485.


When Healthcare Professionals Use AI: Exploring Work Well-Being Through Psychological Needs Satisfaction and Job Complexity.

Huo W, Li Q, Liang B, Wang Y, Li X Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851892 PMC: 11761562. DOI: 10.3390/bs15010088.


Addressing ethical issues in healthcare artificial intelligence using a lifecycle-informed process.

Collins B, Belisle-Pipon J, Evans B, Ferryman K, Jiang X, Nebeker C JAMIA Open. 2024; 7(4):ooae108.

PMID: 39553826 PMC: 11565898. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae108.


Artificial Intelligence in the Organization of Nursing Care: A Scoping Review.

Ventura-Silva J, Martins M, Trindade L, Faria A, Pereira S, Zuge S Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(4):2733-2745.

PMID: 39449439 PMC: 11503362. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14040202.


An ethics assessment tool for artificial intelligence implementation in healthcare: CARE-AI.

Ning Y, Liu X, Collins G, Moons K, McCradden M, Ting D Nat Med. 2024; 30(11):3038-3039.

PMID: 39424948 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-024-03310-1.


References
1.
Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, Clifton D, Collins G, Denaxas S . Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. Nat Med. 2022; 28(5):924-933. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9. View

2.
Sendak M, Gao M, Brajer N, Balu S . Presenting machine learning model information to clinical end users with model facts labels. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:41. PMC: 7090057. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-020-0253-3. View

3.
Bedoya A, Economou-Zavlanos N, Goldstein B, Young A, Jelovsek J, OBrien C . A framework for the oversight and local deployment of safe and high-quality prediction models. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022; 29(9):1631-1636. PMC: 9382367. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac078. View

4.
Cary Jr M, Zink A, Wei S, Olson A, Yan M, Senior R . Mitigating Racial And Ethnic Bias And Advancing Health Equity In Clinical Algorithms: A Scoping Review. Health Aff (Millwood). 2023; 42(10):1359-1368. PMC: 10668606. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00553. View

5.
Solomon M, Henao R, Economau-Zavlanos N, Smith I, Adagarla B, Overton A . Encounter Appropriateness Score for You Model: Development and Pilot Implementation of a Predictive Model to Identify Visits Appropriate for Telehealth in Rheumatology. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023; 76(1):63-71. DOI: 10.1002/acr.25247. View