» Articles » PMID: 38030886

The Geography of Technological Innovation Dynamics

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38030886
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cities and metropolitan areas are major drivers of creativity and innovation in all possible sectors: scientific, technological, social, artistic, etc. The critical concentration and proximity of diverse mindsets and opportunities, supported by efficient infrastructures, enable new technologies and ideas to emerge, thrive, and trigger further innovation. Though this pattern seems well established, geography's role in the emergence and diffusion of new technologies still needs to be clarified. An additional important question concerns the identification of the technological innovation pathways of metropolitan areas. Here, we explore the factors that influence the spread of technology among metropolitan areas worldwide and how geography and political borders impact this process. Our evidence suggests that political geography has been highly important for the diffusion of technological innovation till around two decades ago, slowly declining afterwards in favour of a more global patenting ecosystem. Further, the visualisation of the evolution of countries and metropolitan areas in a 2d space of competitiveness and diversification reveals the existence of two main technological innovation pathways, discriminating between different strategies towards progress. Our work provides insights for policymakers seeking to promote economic growth and technological advancement through tailored investments in prioritarian technological innovation areas.

Citing Articles

The potential impact of AI innovations on US occupations.

Septiandri A, Constantinides M, Quercia D PNAS Nexus. 2024; 3(9):pgae320.

PMID: 39319327 PMC: 11421150. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae320.

References
1.
Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Hayes R, Whalley M, Memmott J . The impact of an alien plant on a native plant-pollinator network: an experimental approach. Ecol Lett. 2007; 10(7):539-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01055.x. View

2.
Youn H, Strumsky D, Bettencourt L, Lobo J . Invention as a combinatorial process: evidence from US patents. J R Soc Interface. 2015; 12(106). PMC: 4424706. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2015.0272. View

3.
Tacchella A, Cristelli M, Caldarelli G, Gabrielli A, Pietronero L . A new metrics for countries' fitness and products' complexity. Sci Rep. 2012; 2:723. PMC: 3467565. DOI: 10.1038/srep00723. View

4.
Pavlopoulos G, Kontou P, Pavlopoulou A, Bouyioukos C, Markou E, Bagos P . Bipartite graphs in systems biology and medicine: a survey of methods and applications. Gigascience. 2018; 7(4):1-31. PMC: 6333914. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giy014. View

5.
Beyar R, Zeevi B, Rechavi G . Israel: a start-up life science nation. Lancet. 2017; 389(10088):2563-2569. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30704-3. View