» Articles » PMID: 38026138

The Third Medical Emergency Teams - Hospital Outcomes in a Day (METHOD3) Study: The Application of Quality Metrics for Rapid Response Systems Around the World

Overview
Journal Resusc Plus
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38026138
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the readiness of international hospitals to implement consensus-based quality metrics for rapid response systems (RRS) and evaluate the feasibility of collecting these metrics.

Methods: A digital survey was developed and distributed to hospital administrators and clinicians worldwide. The survey captured data on the recommended quality metrics for RRS and collected information on hospital characteristics. Statistical analysis included descriptive evaluations and comparisons by country and hospital type.

Results: A total of 109 hospitals from 11 countries participated in the survey. Most hospitals had some form of RRS in place, with multiple parameter track and trigger systems being commonly used. The survey revealed variations in the adoption of quality metrics among hospitals. Metrics related to patient-activated rapid response and organizational culture were collected less frequently. Geographical differences were observed, with hospitals in Australia and New Zealand demonstrating higher adoption of core quality metrics. Urban hospitals reported a lower number of recorded metrics compared to metropolitan and rural hospitals.

Conclusion: The study highlights the feasibility of collecting consensus-based quality metrics for RRS in international hospitals. However, variations in data collection and adoption of specific metrics suggest potential barriers and the need for further exploration. Standardized quality metrics are crucial for effective RRS functioning and continuous improvement in patient care. Collaborative initiatives and further research are needed to overcome barriers, enhance data collection capabilities, and facilitate knowledge sharing among healthcare providers to improve the quality and safety of RRS implementation globally.

References
1.
Olsen S, Soreide E, Hillman K, Hansen B . Succeeding with rapid response systems - a never-ending process: A systematic review of how health-care professionals perceive facilitators and barriers within the limbs of the RRS. Resuscitation. 2019; 144:75-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.034. View

2.
Bucknall T, Quinney R, Booth L, McKinney A, Subbe C, Odell M . When patients (and families) raise the alarm: Patient and family activated rapid response as a safety strategy for hospitals. Future Healthc J. 2021; 8(3):e609-e612. PMC: 8651329. DOI: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0134. View

3.
Sethi S, Chalwin R . Governance of rapid response teams in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2018; 46(3):304-312. DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1804600308. View

4.
Aveling E, Martin G, Armstrong N, Banerjee J, Dixon-Woods M . Quality improvement through clinical communities: eight lessons for practice. J Health Organ Manag. 2012; 26(2):158-74. DOI: 10.1108/14777261211230754. View

5.
Culler S, Atherly A, Walczak S, Davis A, Hawley J, Rask K . Urban-rural differences in the availability of hospital information technology applications: a survey of Georgia hospitals. J Rural Health. 2006; 22(3):242-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00039.x. View