Evidence for the Adaptive Parsing of Non-communicative Eye Movements During Joint Attention Interactions

Overview

Journal PeerJ

Specialties Biology
Environmental Health
General Medicine

Date 2023 Nov 29

PMID 38025743

Authors

Ayeh Alhasan

Nathan Caruana

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

During social interactions, the ability to detect and respond to gaze-based joint attention bids often involves the evaluation of non-communicative eye movements. However, very little is known about how much humans are able to track and parse spatial information from these non-communicative eye movements over time, and the extent to which this influences joint attention outcomes. This was investigated in the current study using an interactive computer-based joint attention game. Using a fully within-subjects design, we specifically examined whether participants were quicker to respond to communicative joint attention bids that followed predictive, as opposed to random or no, non-communicative gaze behaviour. Our results suggest that in complex, dynamic tasks, people adaptively and non-communicative gaze information depending on whether it informs the locus of an upcoming joint attention bid. We also went further to examine the extent to which this ability to track dynamic spatial information was specific to processing gaze information. This was achieved by comparing performance to a closely matched non-social task where eye gaze cues were replaced with dynamic arrow stimuli. Whilst we found that people are also able to track and use dynamic non-social information from arrows, there was clear evidence for a relative advantage for tracking gaze cues during social interactions. The implications of these findings for social neuroscience and autism research are discussed.

References

Caruana N, Seymour K, Brock J, Langdon R . Responding to joint attention bids in schizophrenia: An interactive eye-tracking study. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019; 72(8):2068-2083. DOI: 10.1177/1747021819829718. View

Mundy P . A review of joint attention and social-cognitive brain systems in typical development and autism spectrum disorder. Eur J Neurosci. 2017; 47(6):497-514. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13720. View

Kampe K, Frith C, Frith U . "Hey John": signals conveying communicative intention toward the self activate brain regions associated with "mentalizing," regardless of modality. J Neurosci. 2003; 23(12):5258-63. PMC: 6741156. View

KANNER L . Autistic disturbances of affective contact. Acta Paedopsychiatr. 1968; 35(4):100-36. View

McKay K, Grainger S, Coundouris S, Skorich D, Phillips L, Henry J . Visual attentional orienting by eye gaze: A meta-analytic review of the gaze-cueing effect. Psychol Bull. 2022; 147(12):1269-1289. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000353. View

Adrien J, LENOIR P, Martineau J, Perrot A, Hameury L, Larmande C . Blind ratings of early symptoms of autism based upon family home movies. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1993; 32(3):617-26. DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199305000-00019. View

Akhtar N, DUNHAM F, Dunham P . Directive interactions and early vocabulary development: the role of joint attentional focus. J Child Lang. 1991; 18(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1017/s0305000900013283. View

Mundy P . Annotation: the neural basis of social impairments in autism: the role of the dorsal medial-frontal cortex and anterior cingulate system. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003; 44(6):793-809. DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00165. View

Schilbach L, Wohlschlaeger A, Kraemer N, Newen A, Jon Shah N, Fink G . Being with virtual others: Neural correlates of social interaction. Neuropsychologia. 2005; 44(5):718-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.017. View

10.

Zwaigenbaum L, Bryson S, Rogers T, Roberts W, Brian J, Szatmari P . Behavioral manifestations of autism in the first year of life. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2005; 23(2-3):143-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2004.05.001. View

11.

Caruana N, McArthur G, Woolgar A, Brock J . Simulating social interactions for the experimental investigation of joint attention. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 74(Pt A):115-125. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.022. View

12.

Senju A, Johnson M . The eye contact effect: mechanisms and development. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(3):127-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009. View

13.

Helminen T, Kaasinen S, Hietanen J . Eye contact and arousal: the effects of stimulus duration. Biol Psychol. 2011; 88(1):124-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.002. View

14.

Dalmaso M, Castelli L, Galfano G . Attention holding elicited by direct-gaze faces is reflected in saccadic peak velocity. Exp Brain Res. 2017; 235(11):3319-3332. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5059-4. View

15.

Hietanen J, Peltola M, Hietanen J . Psychophysiological responses to eye contact in a live interaction and in video call. Psychophysiology. 2020; 57(6):e13587. DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13587. View

16.

Behne T, Carpenter M, Tomasello M . One-year-olds comprehend the communicative intentions behind gestures in a hiding game. Dev Sci. 2005; 8(6):492-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00440.x. View

17.

Dalmaso M, Castelli L, Galfano G . Social modulators of gaze-mediated orienting of attention: A review. Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 27(5):833-855. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01730-x. View

18.

Morgan E, Freeth M, Smith D . Mental State Attributions Mediate the Gaze Cueing Effect. Vision (Basel). 2019; 2(1). PMC: 6835774. DOI: 10.3390/vision2010011. View

19.

Mundy P, Newell L . Attention, Joint Attention, and Social Cognition. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009; 16(5):269-274. PMC: 2663908. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00518.x. View

20.

Caruana N, Inkley C, Nalepka P, Kaplan D, Richardson M . Gaze facilitates responsivity during hand coordinated joint attention. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21037. PMC: 8548595. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00476-3. View