The Tendency of the Schematic Structure to Maintain Stability Can Be Interpreted As Mental Inertia

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2023 Nov 29

PMID 38022980

Authors

Berlyne Wei

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This paper incorporates schematic concepts related to mental inertia and provides an avenue for interpreting psychology using the principles of classical mechanics. Schemas find wide application in diverse fields, ranging from ergonomics to psychotherapy. Nonetheless, it is crucial to incorporate schemas themselves into a more unified and comprehensive theoretical framework. Drawing upon the free energy principle (FEP) and the second law of thermodynamics, it is evident that humans possess a natural inclination to construct and maintain consistent cognitive structures. This characteristic contributes to the stability of schemas within a defined range. The particular scope of the model is closely intertwined with its structure, leading to variations among individuals in diverse environments. The coherence of the schema within a defined range can be perceived as the magnitude of mental inertia. This psychological analogy emphasizes the importance of considering the influences exerted by the external environment and their effects on mental inertia when predicting the human mind and behavior.

References

Soon C, Brass M, Heinze H, Haynes J . Unconscious determinants of free decisions in the human brain. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11(5):543-5. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2112. View

Sigman M, Pan H, Yang Y, Stern E, Silbersweig D, Gilbert C . Top-down reorganization of activity in the visual pathway after learning a shape identification task. Neuron. 2005; 46(5):823-35. PMC: 1440484. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.014. View

Stanton N, Stewart R, Harris D, Houghton R, Baber C, McMaster R . Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics. 2006; 49(12-13):1288-311. DOI: 10.1080/00140130600612762. View

Yakin D, Grasman R, Arntz A . Schema modes as a common mechanism of change in personality pathology and functioning: Results from a randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2020; 126:103553. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103553. View

Connolly P, van Deventer V . Hierarchical Recursive Organization and the Free Energy Principle: From Biological Self-Organization to the Psychoanalytic Mind. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1695. PMC: 5623195. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01695. View

Stanton N, Walker G . Exploring the psychological factors involved in the Ladbroke Grove rail accident. Accid Anal Prev. 2011; 43(3):1117-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.020. View

Friston K . The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?. Trends Cogn Sci. 2009; 13(7):293-301. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005. View

Baber C . Cognitive aspects of tool use. Appl Ergon. 2005; 37(1):3-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.004. View

Baltes P, Staudinger U . Wisdom. A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. Am Psychol. 2001; 55(1):122-36. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.122. View

10.

Bernstein D, Keulen-de Vos M, Clercx M, de Vogel V, Kersten G, Lancel M . Schema therapy for violent PD offenders: a randomized clinical trial. Psychol Med. 2021; 53(1):88-102. PMC: 9874993. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291721001161. View

11.

Anderson B . Controlled information processing, automaticity, and the burden of proof. Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 25(5):1814-1823. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1412-7. View

12.

Edwards D . Using Schema Modes for Case Conceptualization in Schema Therapy: An Applied Clinical Approach. Front Psychol. 2022; 12:763670. PMC: 8813040. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763670. View

13.

Peterson C . Development of social-cognitive and communication skills in children born deaf. Scand J Psychol. 2009; 50(5):475-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00750.x. View

14.

Ellis B, Bianchi J, Griskevicius V, Frankenhuis W . Beyond Risk and Protective Factors: An Adaptation-Based Approach to Resilience. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017; 12(4):561-587. DOI: 10.1177/1745691617693054. View

15.

Kuperberg G . Tea With Milk? A Hierarchical Generative Framework of Sequential Event Comprehension. Top Cogn Sci. 2020; 13(1):256-298. PMC: 7897219. DOI: 10.1111/tops.12518. View

16.

Friston K . Life as we know it. J R Soc Interface. 2013; 10(86):20130475. PMC: 3730701. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0475. View

17.

Armengou F . The death drive: conceptual analysis and relevance in the Spanish psychoanalytic community. Int J Psychoanal. 2009; 90(2):263-89. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00121.x. View

18.

Ellis B, Figueredo A, Brumbach B, Schlomer G . Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk : The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies. Hum Nat. 2014; 20(2):204-68. DOI: 10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7. View

19.

Tran The J, Ansermet J, Magistretti P, Ansermet F . From the Principle of Inertia to the Death Drive: The Influence of the Second Law of Thermodynamics on the Freudian Theory of the Psychical Apparatus. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:325. PMC: 7058684. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00325. View

20.

Hoyer J, colic J, Pittig A, Crawcour S, Moeser M, Ginzburg D . Manualized cognitive therapy versus cognitive-behavioral treatment-as-usual for social anxiety disorder in routine practice: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Behav Res Ther. 2017; 95:87-98. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.05.012. View