» Articles » PMID: 38021367

Smarter Eco-cities and Their Leading-edge Artificial Intelligence of Things Solutions for Environmental Sustainability: A Comprehensive Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38021367
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The recent advancements made in the realms of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Artificial Intelligence of Things (AIoT) have unveiled transformative prospects and opportunities to enhance and optimize the environmental performance and efficiency of smart cities. These strides have, in turn, impacted smart eco-cities, catalyzing ongoing improvements and driving solutions to address complex environmental challenges. This aligns with the visionary concept of smarter eco-cities, an emerging paradigm of urbanism characterized by the seamless integration of advanced technologies and environmental strategies. However, there remains a significant gap in thoroughly understanding this new paradigm and the intricate spectrum of its multifaceted underlying dimensions. To bridge this gap, this study provides a comprehensive systematic review of the burgeoning landscape of smarter eco-cities and their leading-edge AI and AIoT solutions for environmental sustainability. To ensure thoroughness, the study employs a unified evidence synthesis framework integrating aggregative, configurative, and narrative synthesis approaches. At the core of this study lie these subsequent research inquiries: What are the foundational underpinnings of emerging smarter eco-cities, and how do they intricately interrelate, particularly urbanism paradigms, environmental solutions, and data-driven technologies? What are the key drivers and enablers propelling the materialization of smarter eco-cities? What are the primary AI and AIoT solutions that can be harnessed in the development of smarter eco-cities? In what ways do AI and AIoT technologies contribute to fostering environmental sustainability practices, and what potential benefits and opportunities do they offer for smarter eco-cities? What challenges and barriers arise in the implementation of AI and AIoT solutions for the development of smarter eco-cities? The findings significantly deepen and broaden our understanding of both the significant potential of AI and AIoT technologies to enhance sustainable urban development practices, as well as the formidable nature of the challenges they pose. Beyond theoretical enrichment, these findings offer invaluable insights and new perspectives poised to empower policymakers, practitioners, and researchers to advance the integration of eco-urbanism and AI- and AIoT-driven urbanism. Through an insightful exploration of the contemporary urban landscape and the identification of successfully applied AI and AIoT solutions, stakeholders gain the necessary groundwork for making well-informed decisions, implementing effective strategies, and designing policies that prioritize environmental well-being.

Citing Articles

Generative spatial artificial intelligence for sustainable smart cities: A pioneering large flow model for urban digital twin.

Huang J, Bibri S, Keel P Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2025; 24:100526.

PMID: 39995465 PMC: 11847743. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2025.100526.


Emerging technologies for the management of diabetic foot ulceration: a review.

Sidhu A, Harbuzova V Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2024; 5:1440209.

PMID: 39600625 PMC: 11588682. DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2024.1440209.


Neurosustainability.

Khalil M Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1436179.

PMID: 39268220 PMC: 11390526. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1436179.


The synergistic interplay of artificial intelligence and digital twin in environmentally planning sustainable smart cities: A comprehensive systematic review.

Bibri S, Huang J, Jagatheesaperumal S, Krogstie J Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2024; 20:100433.

PMID: 38831974 PMC: 11145432. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2024.100433.


The impact of AI assimilation on firm performance in small and medium-sized enterprises: A moderated multi-mediation model.

Abdul Wahab M, Radmehr M Heliyon. 2024; 10(8):e29580.

PMID: 38660279 PMC: 11040060. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29580.


References
1.
Akhtar M, Hannan M, Begum R, Basri H, Scavino E . Backtracking search algorithm in CVRP models for efficient solid waste collection and route optimization. Waste Manag. 2017; 61:117-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.022. View

2.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

3.
Sharps K, Masante D, Thomas A, Jackson B, Redhead J, May L . Comparing strengths and weaknesses of three ecosystem services modelling tools in a diverse UK river catchment. Sci Total Environ. 2017; 584-585:118-130. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.160. View

4.
Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, Young B, Sutton A . Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2005; 10(1):45-53. DOI: 10.1177/135581960501000110. View

5.
Brisimi T, Chen R, Mela T, Olshevsky A, Paschalidis I, Shi W . Federated learning of predictive models from federated Electronic Health Records. Int J Med Inform. 2018; 112:59-67. PMC: 5836813. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.007. View