» Articles » PMID: 38020979

Visual Acuity in Patients with Non-functioning Pituitary Adenoma: Prognostic Factors and Long-term Outcome After Surgery

Overview
Journal Brain Spine
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38020979
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Visual acuity (VA) and visual field defects (VF) are evaluated in the preoperative management of non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA). The former is less studied than the latter.

Research Question: To analyze preoperative factors, including adenoma volumetry, associated with reduced VA and postoperative improvement of VA over five years after surgery.

Methods: Eighty-seven patients who had primary surgery for NFPA were retrospectively reviewed. Eyes were categorized by best/worse preoperative VA. Ophthalmology review was performed before surgery, at three months, one to two years, and five years post-surgery.

Results: Reduced VA in any eye was present in 55%. VA of the worse eye improved in 77% and normalized in 54%. The majority improved within three months. Additional cases with VA improvement were seen at 1-2 years after surgery. No further improvement was seen five years after surgery. Fifty percent of patients with, per definition, normal preoperative VA showed improved VA postoperatively. Tumor height above the sella in the sagittal plane was the best radiological predictor of reduced VA. Volumetry did not add to accuracy. Age, sagittal tumor height and visual field defects were risk factors of preoperative reduced VA. No predictors of postoperative recovery were identified.

Conclusion: Half of patients with reduced VA recover fully. All patients, independent of age and degree of VA reduction, may improve. No predictors of recovery were found. Early improvement is common and improvement beyond two years is unlikely. The frequency of reduced VA is underestimated. The present results could be of value in pre- and postoperative counseling.

Citing Articles

Clinical efficacy of optical coherence tomography parameters to predict the visual field outcome following pituitary adenoma surgery.

Han K, Choi H, Kim S, Lee S, Lee J PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313521.

PMID: 39531448 PMC: 11556729. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313521.


Insights into Visual Outcomes and Determinants in Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Kemchoknatee P, Singhakul C, Arjkongharn N, Vongsa N, Tangon D, Srisombut T Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:1779-1788.

PMID: 38919405 PMC: 11198008. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S463303.

References
1.
Sun W, Fu Y, Shi Y, Cheng J, Cao P, Shi R . Paranodal myelin damage after acute stretch in Guinea pig spinal cord. J Neurotrauma. 2011; 29(3):611-9. PMC: 3278818. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2011.2086. View

2.
Anik I, Anik Y, Cabuk B, Caklili M, Pirhan D, Ozturk O . Visual Outcome of an Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach in Pituitary Macroadenomas: Quantitative Assessment with Diffusion Tensor Imaging Early and Long-Term Results. World Neurosurg. 2018; 112:e691-e701. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.134. View

3.
Chabot J, Chakraborty S, Imbarrato G, Dehdashti A . Evaluation of Outcomes After Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery for Large and Giant Pituitary Macroadenoma: A Retrospective Review of 39 Consecutive Patients. World Neurosurg. 2015; 84(4):978-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.06.007. View

4.
Tjornstrand A, Gunnarsson K, Evert M, Holmberg E, Ragnarsson O, Rosen T . The incidence rate of pituitary adenomas in western Sweden for the period 2001-2011. Eur J Endocrinol. 2014; 171(4):519-26. DOI: 10.1530/EJE-14-0144. View

5.
Rhoton Jr A . The sellar region. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51(4 Suppl):S335-74. View