Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio for Evaluation of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Correlated with Plaque Morphology: Substudy Results of the ANTIQUE Study

Overview

Journal Front Neurol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2023 Nov 29

PMID 38020621

Authors

David Pakizer

Anna Vybiralova

Tomas Jonszta

Martin Roubec

Michal Kral

Vendelin Chovanec

Roman Herzig

Tomas Heryan

David Skoloudik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of carotid stenosis severity is important for proper patient management. The present study aimed to compare the evaluation of carotid stenosis severity using four duplex sonography (DUS) measurements, including peak systolic velocity (PSV), PSV ratio in stenosis and distal to stenosis (PSV ratio), end-diastolic velocity (EDV), and B-mode, with computed tomography angiography (CTA), and to evaluate the impact of plaque morphology on correlation between DUS and CTA.

Methods: Consecutive patients with carotid stenosis of ≥40% examined using DUS and CTA were included. Plaque morphology was also determined using magnetic resonance imaging. Spearman's correlation and Kendall's rank correlation were used to evaluate the results.

Results: A total of 143 cases of internal carotid artery stenosis of ≥40% based on DUS were analyzed. The PSV ratio showed the highest correlation [Spearman's correlation = 0.576) with CTA, followed by PSV ( = 0.526), B-mode measurement ( = 0.482), and EDV ( = 0.441; < 0.001 in all cases]. The worst correlation was found for PSV when the plaque was calcified ( = 0.238), whereas EDV showed a higher correlation ( = 0.523). Correlations of B-mode measurement were superior for plaques with smooth surface ( = 0.677), while the PSV ratio showed the highest correlation in stenoses with irregular ( = 0.373) or ulcerated ( = 0.382) surfaces, as well as lipid ( = 0.406), fibrous ( = 0.461), and mixed ( = 0.403; < 0.01 in all cases) plaques. Nevertheless, differences between the mentioned correlations were not statistically significant ( > 0.05 in all cases).

Conclusion: PSV, PSV ratio, EDV, and B-mode measurements showed comparable correlations with CTA in evaluation of carotid artery stenosis based on their correlation with CTA results. Heavy calcifications and plaque surface irregularity or ulceration negatively influenced the measurement accuracy.

Citing Articles

Extracranial carotid plaque calcification and its association with risk factors for cerebrovascular events: insights from the ANTIQUE study.

Pakizer D, Salounova D, Skoloudik D Front Neurol. 2025; 16:1532883.

PMID: 39944551 PMC: 11813772. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1532883.

Carotid Artery Doppler: A Possible Non-invasive Diagnostic Approach to Assessing the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease.

Agarwal R, Gadupati J, Ramaiah S, Babu V, Jain A, Prakash V Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e62886.

PMID: 39040738 PMC: 11261422. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62886.

References

Naylor R, Rantner B, Ancetti S, de Borst G, De Carlo M, Halliday A . Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2022; 65(1):7-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011. View

Oates C, Naylor A, Hartshorne T, Charles S, Fail T, Humphries K . Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2008; 37(3):251-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2008.10.015. View

Elhfnawy A, Heuschmann P, Pham M, Volkmann J, Fluri F . Stenosis Length and Degree Interact With the Risk of Cerebrovascular Events Related to Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis. Front Neurol. 2019; 10:317. PMC: 6465418. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00317. View

Busuttil S, Franklin D, Youkey J, Elmore J . Carotid duplex overestimation of stenosis due to severe contralateral disease. Am J Surg. 1996; 172(2):144-7; discussion 147-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00137-7. View

Bonati L, Kakkos S, Berkefeld J, de Borst G, Bulbulia R, Halliday A . European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Eur Stroke J. 2021; 6(2):I-XLVII. PMC: 8370069. DOI: 10.1177/23969873211012121. View

Brouwers J, Versluijs Y, van Walderveen M, Hamming J, Schepers A . Imaging Assessment of Carotid Artery Stenosis Varies in Clinical Practice. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020; 60(4):632-633. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.07.014. View

Ooi Y, Gonzalez N . Management of extracranial carotid artery disease. Cardiol Clin. 2014; 33(1):1-35. PMC: 4694631. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2014.09.001. View

Kagawa R, Moritake K, Shima T, Okada Y . Validity of B-mode ultrasonographic findings in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in comparison with angiographic and clinicopathologic features. Stroke. 1996; 27(4):700-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.27.4.700. View

Diethrich E, Ndiaye M, Reid D . Stenting in the carotid artery: initial experience in 110 patients. J Endovasc Surg. 1996; 3(1):42-62. DOI: 10.1583/1074-6218(1996)003<0042:SITCAI>2.0.CO;2. View

10.

Wolf P, OLeary D, Poehlman H, Belanger A, Kase C, DAgostino R . Precursors of extracranial carotid atherosclerosis in the Framingham Study. Neurology. 1994; 44(6):1046-50. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.44.6.1046. View

11.

Ricotta J, AbuRahma A, Ascher E, Eskandari M, Faries P, Lal B . Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 54(3):e1-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.031. View

12.

Walker J, Naylor A . Ultrasound based measurement of 'carotid stenosis >70%': an audit of UK practice. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006; 31(5):487-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.11.029. View

13.

Mohebali J, Patel V, Romero J, Hannon K, Jaff M, Cambria R . Acoustic shadowing impairs accurate characterization of stenosis in carotid ultrasound examinations. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62(5):1236-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.137. View

14.

Netuka D, Belsan T, Broulikova K, Mandys V, Charvat F, Malik J . Detection of carotid artery stenosis using histological specimens: a comparison of CT angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and Doppler ultrasonography. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016; 158(8):1505-14. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-016-2842-0. View

15.

Saba L, Sanfilippo R, Sannia S, Anzidei M, Montisci R, Mallarini G . Association between carotid artery plaque volume, composition, and ulceration: a retrospective assessment with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199(1):151-6. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.11.6955. View

16.

Li J, Jiang Y, Zhang S, Wang L, Ouyang Y, Qi Z . Evaluation of renal artery stenosis with hemodynamic parameters of Doppler sonography. J Vasc Surg. 2008; 48(2):323-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.03.048. View

17.

van Everdingen K, van der Grond J, Kappelle L . Overestimation of a stenosis in the internal carotid artery by duplex sonography caused by an increase in volume flow. J Vasc Surg. 1998; 27(3):479-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)99999-2. View

18.

Spangler E, Goodney P, Schanzer A, Stone D, Schermerhorn M, Powell R . Outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus stenting in comparable medical risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 60(5):1227-1231.e1. PMC: 5292270. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.044. View

19.

Herzig R, Burval S, Krupka B, Vlachova I, Urbanek K, Mares J . Comparison of ultrasonography, CT angiography, and digital subtraction angiography in severe carotid stenoses. Eur J Neurol. 2004; 11(11):774-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00878.x. View

20.

Barnett H, Taylor D, Haynes R, Sackett D, Peerless S, Ferguson G . Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(7):445-53. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701. View