» Articles » PMID: 38018153

Cognitive, Psychophysiological, and Perceptual Responses to a Repeated Military-Specific Load Carriage Treadmill Simulation

Overview
Journal Hum Factors
Specialty Psychology
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38018153
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dismounted military operations require soldiers to complete cognitive tasks whilst undertaking demanding and repeated physical taskings.

Objective: To assess the effects of repeated fast load carriage bouts on cognitive performance, perceptual responses, and psychophysiological markers.

Methods: Twelve civilian males (age, 28 ± 8 y; stature, 186 ± 6 cm; body mass 84.3 ± 11.1 kg; V̇O, 51.5 ± 6.4 mL·kg·min) completed three ∼65-min bouts of a Fast Load Carriage Protocol (FLCP), each interspersed with a 65-min recovery period, carrying a representative combat load of 25 kg. During each FLCP, cognitive function was assessed using a Shoot/Don't-Shoot Task (SDST) and a Military-Specific Auditory N-Back Task (MSANT), along with subjective ratings. Additional psychophysiological markers (heart rate variability, salivary cortisol, and dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate concentrations) were also measured.

Results: A main effect of bout on MSANT combined score metric ( < .001, Kendall's W = 69.084) and for time on the accuracy-speed trade-off parameter of the SDST ( = .025, Ѡ = .024) was evident. These likely changes in cognitive performance were coupled with subjective data indicating that participants perceived that they increased their mental effort to maintain cognitive performance (bout: < .001, Ѡ = .045; time: < .001, Ѡ = .232). Changes in HRV and salivary markers were also evident, likely tracking increased stress.

Conclusion: Despite the increase in physiological and psychological stress, cognitive performance was largely maintained; purportedly a result of increased mental effort.

Application: Given the likely increase in dual-task interference in the field environment compared with the laboratory, military commanders should seek approaches to manage cognitive load where possible, to maintain soldier performance.

Citing Articles

Metabolic, cardiovascular, neuromuscular and perceptual responses to repeated military-specific load carriage treadmill simulations.

Vine C, Coakley S, Blacker S, Runswick O, Myers S Eur J Sport Sci. 2024; 24(8):1110-1119.

PMID: 38886977 PMC: 11295085. DOI: 10.1002/ejsc.12154.

References
1.
An E, Nolty A, Amano S, Rizzo A, Buckwalter J, Rensberger J . Heart Rate Variability as an Index of Resilience. Mil Med. 2019; 185(3-4):363-369. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usz325. View

2.
Giles G, Hasselquist L, Caruso C, Eddy M . Load Carriage and Physical Exertion Influence Cognitive Control in Military Scenarios. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019; 51(12):2540-2546. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002085. View

3.
Ahmed M, Mandic I, Lou W, Goodman L, Jacobs I, LAbbe M . Comparison of dietary intakes of Canadian Armed Forces personnel consuming field rations in acute hot, cold, and temperate conditions with standardized infantry activities. Mil Med Res. 2019; 6(1):26. PMC: 6696676. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-019-0216-7. View

4.
Martin K, McLeod E, Periard J, Rattray B, Keegan R, Pyne D . The Impact of Environmental Stress on Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review. Hum Factors. 2019; 61(8):1205-1246. DOI: 10.1177/0018720819839817. View

5.
Armstrong N, Smith S, Risius D, Doyle D, Wardle S, P Greeves J . Cognitive performance of military men and women during prolonged load carriage. BMJ Mil Health. 2022; 169(1):37-45. PMC: 9887367. DOI: 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2021-002000. View