» Articles » PMID: 38017416

Prospective Study of Antidepressant Treatment of Psychiatric Patients with Depressive Disorders: Treatment Adequacy and Outcomes

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Nov 29
PMID 38017416
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite numerous national depression care guidelines (DCGs), suboptimal antidepressant treatment may occur. We examined DCG concordance and depression treatment outcomes in psychiatric settings.

Methods: We evaluated treatment received and outcomes of 128 psychiatric out- and inpatients participating in the PEGAD (Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacogenetics of Antidepressant Treatment for Depressive Disorders) study at baseline, two weeks, and eight weeks using interviews and questionnaires. Inclusion criteria were ICD-10 diagnosis of a depressive disorder, a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 symptom (PHQ-9) score ≥ 10, and a new antidepressant prescribed. The primary outcome of the study was within-individual change in PHQ-9 scores.

Results: At baseline, patients had predominately recurrent (83%) and in 19% treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The median preceding duration of the current episode was 6.5 months. At eight weeks, 85% of the patients (n = 107) used a DCG-concordant antidepressant dose. However, due to the scarcity of antidepressant combinations and augmentations, fewer TRD than non-TRD patients (25% vs. 84%, p < 0.005) received adequate antidepressant treatment. Additionally, one-third of the patients received inadequate follow-up. Overall, only 53% received treatment compatible with DCG recommendations for adequate pharmacotherapy and follow-up. The mean decline in PHQ-9 scores (-3.8 ± SD 5.7) was significant (p < 0.0005). Nearly 40% of the patients reached a subthreshold level of depression (PHQ-9 < 10), predicted by a lower baseline PHQ-9 score, recurrent depression, and female sex. However, 45% experienced no significant clinical improvement (PHQ-9 score reduction < 20%).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that inadequate treatment continues to occur in psychiatric care settings, particularly for TRD patients.

References
1.
Gabilondo A, Rojas-Farreras S, Rodriguez A, Fernandez A, Pinto-Meza A, Vilagut G . Use of primary and specialized mental health care for a major depressive episode in Spain by ESEMeD respondents. Psychiatr Serv. 2011; 62(2):152-61. DOI: 10.1176/ps.62.2.pss6202_0152. View

2.
Henssler J, Alexander D, Schwarzer G, Bschor T, Baethge C . Combining Antidepressants vs Antidepressant Monotherapy for Treatment of Patients With Acute Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2022; 79(4):300-312. PMC: 8851370. DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.4313. View

3.
Mahlich J, Tsukazawa S, Wiegand F . Estimating Prevalence and Healthcare Utilization for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Japan: A Retrospective Claims Database Study. Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2017; 5(1):35-43. PMC: 5825389. DOI: 10.1007/s40801-017-0126-5. View

4.
Hirschfeld R . The Mood Disorder Questionnaire: A Simple, Patient-Rated Screening Instrument for Bipolar Disorder. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2004; 4(1):9-11. PMC: 314375. DOI: 10.4088/pcc.v04n0104. View

5.
Cipriani A, Furukawa T, Salanti G, Chaimani A, Atkinson L, Ogawa Y . Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018; 391(10128):1357-1366. PMC: 5889788. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32802-7. View