» Articles » PMID: 38015870

The Serbian Validation of the Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 and the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2023 Nov 28
PMID 38015870
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The widely used Rational-Experiential Inventory-40 (REI-40) assesses Rational and Experiential thinking styles. Recently, the authors have distinguished three aspects of the Experiential style: Intuition, Emotionality and Imagination and developed the Rational-Experiential Multimodal Inventory (REIm). In this study, we examined the internal consistency, structural/factorial, discriminant and known-groups validity of both REI-40 and REIm, in two samples of Serbian students. Participants in Study 1 (N = 819, mean age M = 19.81, 31% males) completed REI-40 and HEXACO Personality Inventory (HEXACO-PI-R), while participants in Study 2 (N = 304, mean age M = 19.47, 29% males) completed REIm, HEXACO-PI-R and Disintegration inventory DELTA. The internal consistency of both REI version subscales was acceptable to good. The results of CFA analyses indicated an acceptable fit for REI-40, while the structural validity of REIm was poor. Both REI-40 subscales (Rationality and Experientiality), as well as REIm Intuition demonstrated only a small content overlap with basic personality traits, while REIm Experientiality, Emotionality and Imagination correlated highly with Openness and Emotionality. We also observed some gender differences in the expected direction.

References
1.
Lee K, Ashton M . Psychometric Properties of the HEXACO-100. Assessment. 2016; 25(5):543-556. DOI: 10.1177/1073191116659134. View

2.
Bjorklund F, Backstrom M . Individual differences in processing styles: validity of the Rational-Experiential Inventory. Scand J Psychol. 2008; 49(5):439-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00652.x. View

3.
Lazarevic L, Puric D, Teovanovic P, Lukic P, Zupan Z, Knezevic G . What drives us to be (ir)responsible for our health during the COVID-19 pandemic? The role of personality, thinking styles, and conspiracy mentality. Pers Individ Dif. 2021; 176:110771. PMC: 7879160. DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.110771. View

4.
Pacini R, Epstein S . The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999; 76(6):972-87. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.972. View

5.
Brankovic M . Who Believes in ESP: Cognitive and Motivational Determinants of the Belief in Extra-Sensory Perception. Eur J Psychol. 2019; 15(1):120-139. PMC: 6396695. DOI: 10.5964/ejop.v15i1.1689. View