» Articles » PMID: 38015260

Molecular Pathology in Breast Disease: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Tools

Overview
Journal Virchows Arch
Date 2023 Nov 28
PMID 38015260
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Molecular testing in breast cancer gained increasing attention and importance as specific molecular results can tailor not only oncological decisions on systemic adjuvant or neoadjuvant or in metastatic setting, but increasingly serve in diagnostic routine histopathological services to differentiate between morphologically overlapping or ambiguous histological pictures. Diagnostic tools involve in most cases a broad spectrum of immunohistochemical panels, followed by entity-specific in situ hybridization probes and in given cases NGS-based sequencing. Workflow of which methodology is applied and in which order depends on the specific entity resp. on the given differential diagnosis in question. Regarding prognostic/predictive molecular testing, the choice of assay and the workflow are based on clinical algorithms and on the evidence of targeted therapies following the molecular alterations. In this review paper, we aim to address the use of molecular technics in [1] the histological diagnostic setting (such as subtyping of invasive carcinomas/malignant spindle cell tumors and sarcomas and some B3 lesions) and [2] in the context of adjuvant or neoadjuvant or other clinical settings with special focus of targeted therapies.

References
1.
Gennari A, Andre F, Barrios C, Cortes J, de Azambuja E, DeMichele A . ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021; 32(12):1475-1495. DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019. View

2.
Laetsch T, Dubois S, Mascarenhas L, Turpin B, Federman N, Albert C . Larotrectinib for paediatric solid tumours harbouring NTRK gene fusions: phase 1 results from a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018; 19(5):705-714. PMC: 5949072. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30119-0. View

3.
Barroso-Sousa R, Pacifico J, Sammons S, Tolaney S . Tumor Mutational Burden in Breast Cancer: Current Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15). PMC: 10417019. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153997. View

4.
Cima L, Kaya H, Marchio C, Nishimura R, Wen H, Fabbri V . Triple-negative breast carcinomas of low malignant potential: review on diagnostic criteria and differential diagnoses. Virchows Arch. 2021; 480(1):109-126. PMC: 8983547. DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03174-7. View

5.
Varga Z, Sinn P, Seidman A . Summary of head-to-head comparisons of patient risk classifications by the 21-gene Recurrence Score® (RS) assay and other genomic assays for early breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2019; 145(4):882-893. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32139. View