Deconstructing the Roadmap to Surgical Residency: a National Survey of Residents Illuminates Factors Associated with Recruitment Success As Well As Applicants' Needs and Beliefs

Overview

Journal Global Surg Educ

Publisher Springer

Specialty Medical Education

Date 2023 Nov 28

PMID 38013708

Authors

Maria Baimas-George

Lynnette Schiffern

Hongmei Yang

Caroline E Reinke

Steven D Wexner

Brent D Matthews

B Lauren Paton

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: As applications increase and residency becomes more competitive, applicants and programs will be challenged by increased demands on recruitment, metric assessment, and rank determination. Studies have investigated program opinions; however, this survey sought to illuminate the process from an applicant's perspective.

Methods: An anonymous survey was distributed to past or current surgery residents nationwide using social media and program director emails. Regression analyses were performed to assess factors correlating with percentage of programs which offered the applicant an interview.

Results: There were 223 respondents who applied to an average of 61 programs (± 40) with 16 (± 11) interviews offered. Applicants believed that programs were most interested in (1) personality, (2) letter of recommendation (LOR) writers, and (3) medical school reputation. Top factors considered by applicants in ranking were resident culture, location, program reputation, and autonomy. Bivariate analysis found factors that decreased percent of interview invites to be Asian race, whereas factors that increased interview invites included age, year of match, surgery clerkship grade, medicine clerkship grade, AOA status, honor surgery rotation, gold humanism (GHHS) status, phone call for interview made, and step scores (all < 0.05). AOA status, step scores, honor surgery rotation, year of match, and Asian race remained significant after multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: National surveys illuminate how applicants approach the application process and what programs and applicants appear to value. This information provides insight and guidance to candidates and programs as the process of matching becomes more challenging with surging application numbers, changes in testing parameters and virtual interviews.

Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s44186-022-00070-9.

References

Hartman N, Lefebvre C, Manthey D . A Narrative Review of the Evidence Supporting Factors Used by Residency Program Directors to Select Applicants for Interviews. J Grad Med Educ. 2019; 11(3):268-273. PMC: 6570461. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00979.3. View

Jarman B, Kallies K, Joshi A, Smink D, Sarosi G, Chang L . Underrepresented Minorities are Underrepresented Among General Surgery Applicants Selected to Interview. J Surg Educ. 2019; 76(6):e15-e23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.018. View

Robinson K, Shin B, Gangadharan S . A Comparison Between In-Person and Virtual Fellowship Interviews During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Surg Educ. 2020; 78(4):1175-1181. PMC: 7678431. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.11.006. View

Makdisi G, Takeuchi T, Rodriguez J, Rucinski J, Wise L . How we select our residents--a survey of selection criteria in general surgery residents. J Surg Educ. 2011; 68(1):67-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.10.003. View

Wijesekera T, Kim M, Moore E, Sorenson O, Ross D . All Other Things Being Equal: Exploring Racial and Gender Disparities in Medical School Honor Society Induction. Acad Med. 2018; 94(4):562-569. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002463. View

Prober C, Kolars J, First L, Melnick D . A Plea to Reassess the Role of United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 Scores in Residency Selection. Acad Med. 2015; 91(1):12-5. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000855. View

Bradford P, Akyeampong D, Fleming 2nd M, Dacus A, Chhabra A, DeGeorge Jr B . Racial and Gender Discrimination in Hand Surgery Letters of Recommendation. J Hand Surg Am. 2021; 46(11):998-1005.e2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.009. View

Zare S, Galanko J, Behrns K, Sieff E, Boyle L, Farley D . Psychologic well-being of surgery residents after inception of the 80-hour workweek: a multi-institutional study. Surgery. 2005; 138(2):150-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2005.05.011. View

Polanco-Santana J, Storino A, Souza-Mota L, Gangadharan S, Kent T . Ethnic/Racial Bias in Medical School Performance Evaluation of General Surgery Residency Applicants. J Surg Educ. 2021; 78(5):1524-1534. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.02.005. View

10.

Dort J, Trickey A, Kallies K, Joshi A, Sidwell R, Jarman B . Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs. J Surg Educ. 2015; 72(6):e123-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.021. View

11.

Pacana M, Thier Z, Jackson 3rd J, Koon Jr D, Grabowski G . More Than One-third of Orthopaedic Applicants Are in the Top 10%: The Standardized Letter of Recommendation and Evaluation of Orthopaedic Resident Applicants. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021; 479(8):1703-1708. PMC: 8277269. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001707. View

12.

Newsome K, Selvakumar S, McKenny M, Elkbuli A . Shifting the Surgical Residency Match to a 100% Virtual Interview Format During the COVID-19 Pandemic, How has It Affected Placement Into Surgical Training Programs?. Am Surg. 2021; 89(4):935-941. PMC: 10240300. DOI: 10.1177/00031348211047498. View

13.

Powers A, Gerull K, Rothman R, Klein S, Wright R, Dy C . Race- and Gender-Based Differences in Descriptions of Applicants in the Letters of Recommendation for Orthopaedic Surgery Residency. JB JS Open Access. 2020; 5(3). PMC: 7386551. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00023. View

14.

Elmore L, Jeffe D, Jin L, Awad M, Turnbull I . National Survey of Burnout among US General Surgery Residents. J Am Coll Surg. 2016; 223(3):440-51. PMC: 5476455. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.05.014. View

15.

Inclan P, Cooperstein A, Powers A, Dy C, Klein S . When (Almost) Everyone is Above Average: A Critical Analysis of American Orthopaedic Association Committee of Residency Directors Standardized Letters of Recommendation. JB JS Open Access. 2020; 5(3). PMC: 7480965. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00013. View

16.

Lin D, Liebert C, Esquivel M, Tran J, Lau J, Greco R . Prevalence and predictors of depression among general surgery residents. Am J Surg. 2016; 213(2):313-317. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.017. View

17.

Stefanidis D, Miles W, Greene F . Factors influencing residency choice of general surgery applicants--how important is the availability of a skills curriculum?. J Surg Educ. 2010; 66(6):325-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.06.004. View

18.

Lebares C, Guvva E, Ascher N, OSullivan P, Harris H, Epel E . Burnout and Stress Among US Surgery Residents: Psychological Distress and Resilience. J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 226(1):80-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.10.010. View

19.

Stain S, Hiatt J, Ata A, Ashley S, Roggin K, Potts J . Characteristics of highly ranked applicants to general surgery residency programs. JAMA Surg. 2013; 148(5):413-7. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.180. View

20.

Tolan A, Kaji A, Quach C, Hines O, de Virgilio C . The electronic residency application service application can predict accreditation council for graduate medical education competency-based surgical resident performance. J Surg Educ. 2010; 67(6):444-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.05.002. View