» Articles » PMID: 38011669

An International Multicentre Analysis of Current Prescribing Practices and Shared Decision-making in Psoriatic Arthritis

Abstract

Objectives: Shared decision-making (SDM) is advocated to improve patient outcomes in PsA. We analysed current prescribing practices and the extent of SDM in PsA across Europe.

Methods: The ASSIST study was a cross-sectional observational study of PsA patients ≥18 years of age attending face-to-face appointments between July 2021 and March 2022. Patient demographics, current treatment and treatment decisions were recorded. SDM was measured by the clinician's effort to collaborate (CollaboRATE questionnaire) and patient communication confidence (PEPPI-5 tool).

Results: A total of 503 patients were included from 24 centres across the UK, France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Physician- and patient-reported measures of disease activity were highest in the UK. Conventional synthetic DMARDs constituted a higher percentage of current PsA treatment in the UK than continental Europe (66.4% vs 44.9%), which differed from biologic DMARDs (36.4% vs 64.4%). Implementing treatment escalation was most common in the UK. CollaboRATE and PEPPI-5 scores were high across centres. Of 31 patients with low CollaboRATE scores (<4.5), no patients with low PsAID-12 scores (<5) had treatment escalation. However, of 465 patients with CollaboRATE scores ≥4.5, 59 patients with low PsAID-12 scores received treatment escalation.

Conclusions: Higher rates of treatment escalation seen in the UK may be explained by higher disease activity and a younger cohort. High levels of collaboration in face-to-face PsA consultations suggests effective implementation of the SDM approach. Our data indicate that in patients with mild disease activity, only those with higher perceived collaboration underwent treatment escalation. Prospective studies should examine the impact of SDM on PsA patient outcomes.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05171270.

References
1.
Torre Alonso J, Diaz Del Campo Fontecha P, Almodovar R, Canete J, Montilla Morales C, Moreno M . Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on treatment and use of systemic biological and non-biological therapies in psoriatic arthritis. Reumatol Clin (Engl Ed). 2017; 14(5):254-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.reuma.2017.08.007. View

2.
Barr P, Thompson R, Walsh T, Grande S, Ozanne E, Elwyn G . The psychometric properties of CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(1):e2. PMC: 3906697. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3085. View

3.
Healy P, Helliwell P . Measuring clinical enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis: assessment of existing measures and development of an instrument specific to psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 59(5):686-91. DOI: 10.1002/art.23568. View

4.
Villani A, Rouzaud M, Sevrain M, Barnetche T, Paul C, Richard M . Prevalence of undiagnosed psoriatic arthritis among psoriasis patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015; 73(2):242-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.05.001. View

5.
Coates L, Soriano E, Corp N, Bertheussen H, Callis Duffin K, Campanholo C . Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA): updated treatment recommendations for psoriatic arthritis 2021. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2022; 18(8):465-479. PMC: 9244095. DOI: 10.1038/s41584-022-00798-0. View