Comparison of Acceptability & Efficacy of Thermal Ablation (thermocoagulation) & Cryotherapy in VIA Positive Cervical Lesions: A Pilot Study

Overview

Journal Indian J Med Res

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Nov 25

PMID 38006345

Authors

Manju Lata Verma

Parul Sharma

Uma Singh

Rekha Sachan

Pushp Lata Sankhwar

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background Objectives: The World Health Organization (WHO) has endorsed thermal ablation (thermocoagulation) as an efficient and safe modality for treatment of cervical pre-cancer lesions. More evidence is being looked up by WHO through rigorous studies for health delivery models using screen-and-treat strategies incorporating thermal ablation and studies comparing it against the conventional standard modality cryotherapy. The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability of thermal ablation both among the providers and clients and compare the same with cryotherapy.

Methods: A randomized control trial was conducted for one year from September 2019 to October 2020 after obtaining ethics approval. Computer-generated random number table was used for randomization, and eligible candidates were divided into two groups following informed consent. Women with visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) positive cervical lesions in Group A received cryotherapy and Group B received thermal ablation. After the procedure, the acceptability of the provider and the client were assessed using the International Agency for Research on Cancer-validated questionnaire for both the procedures. Immediate side effects and problems at six weeks and at six months were assessed as well. Efficacy was decided by the absence of VIA positivity at six months.

Results: The overall VIA positivity in this study was 11.8 per cent. Thermal ablation (thermocoagulation) had better provision and client acceptability than cryotherapy (significant difference). The efficacy of thermal ablation was 97.6 per cent, while, it was 92 per cent for cryotherapy (not significant).

Interpretation Conclusions: In the context of screen-and-treat programme in settings such as India, thermal ablation appears to be a better method of treatment than cryotherapy for cervical pre-cancerous lesions particularly in terms of better provision and client acceptability.

Citing Articles

Drugs and drug targets for the treatment of HPV-positive cervical cancer.

Burmeister C, Khan S, Prince S Tumour Virus Res. 2024; 19():200309.

PMID: 39709045 PMC: 11733058. DOI: 10.1016/j.tvr.2024.200309.

References

Bhatla N, Gulati A, Mathur S, Rani S, Anand K, Muwonge R . Evaluation of cervical screening in rural North India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 105(2):145-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.12.010. View

Sankaranarayanan R, Nessa A, Esmy P, Dangou J . Visual inspection methods for cervical cancer prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2011; 26(2):221-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2011.08.003. View

Chigbu C, Onwudiwe E, Onyebuchi A . Thermo-coagulation versus cryotherapy for treatment of cervical precancers: A prospective analytical study in a low-resource African setting. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2019; 46(1):147-152. DOI: 10.1111/jog.14139. View

. Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical-cancer screening: test qualities in a primary-care setting. University of Zimbabwe/JHPIEGO Cervical Cancer Project. Lancet. 1999; 353(9156):869-73. View

Paul P, Winkler J, Bartolini R, Penny M, Huong T, Nga L . Screen-and-treat approach to cervical cancer prevention using visual inspection with acetic acid and cryotherapy: experiences, perceptions, and beliefs from demonstration projects in Peru, Uganda, and Vietnam. Oncologist. 2013; 18 Suppl:6-12. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.18-S2-6. View

Pinder L, Parham G, Basu P, Muwonge R, Lucas E, Nyambe N . Thermal ablation versus cryotherapy or loop excision to treat women positive for cervical precancer on visual inspection with acetic acid test: pilot phase of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019; 21(1):175-184. PMC: 6946855. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30635-7. View

Viviano M, Kenfack B, Catarino R, Tincho E, Temogne L, Benski A . Feasibility of thermocoagulation in a screen-and-treat approach for the treatment of cervical precancerous lesions in sub-Saharan Africa. BMC Womens Health. 2017; 17(1):2. PMC: 5219781. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-016-0355-x. View

Naud P, Muwonge R, Passos E, Magno V, Matos J, Sankaranarayanan R . Efficacy, safety, and acceptability of thermocoagulation for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a hospital setting in Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016; 133(3):351-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.09.035. View

Randall T, Sauvaget C, Muwonge R, Trimble E, Jeronimo J . Worthy of further consideration: An updated meta-analysis to address the feasibility, acceptability, safety and efficacy of thermal ablation in the treatment of cervical cancer precursor lesions. Prev Med. 2018; 118:81-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.10.006. View

10.

Sinha P, Srivastava P, Srivastava A . Comparison of Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid and the Pap Smear for Cervical Cancer Screening. Acta Cytol. 2017; 62(1):34-38. DOI: 10.1159/000484036. View

11.

Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, Dikme O . A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: Which to use?. Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 36(4):707-714. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008. View

12.

Dolman L, Sauvaget C, Muwonge R, Sankaranarayanan R . Meta-analysis of the efficacy of cold coagulation as a treatment method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a systematic review. BJOG. 2014; 121(8):929-42. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12655. View

13.

Szarewski A . Cervical screening by visual inspection with acetic acid. Lancet. 2007; 370(9585):365-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61171-4. View

14.

Campbell C, Kafwafwa S, Brown H, Walker G, Madetsa B, Deeny M . Use of thermo-coagulation as an alternative treatment modality in a 'screen-and-treat' programme of cervical screening in rural Malawi. Int J Cancer. 2016; 139(4):908-15. PMC: 5084797. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30101. View