» Articles » PMID: 38004593

Enhancing Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Comparative Analysis of Rapid Point-of-Care Infliximab, Adalimumab and Anti-Drug Antibodies' Determination Against ELISA

Abstract

The introduction of point-of-care (POC) assays into clinical practice in patients with inflammatory disease enables on-demand therapeutic decision making. The aim of this study was to compare the POC test Quantum blue (Bühlmann Laboratories) for infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADL), and its anti-drug antibodies with the traditional ELISA assay (Promonitor). A total of 200 serum samples were analyzed. Samples were classified into the following three different groups; sub-therapeutic range (IFX < 3 μg/mL and ADL < 5 μg/mL); therapeutic range (IFX: 3-7 μg/mL and ADL: 5-12 μg/mL) and supra-therapeutic range (IFX levels > 7 μg/mL and ADL levels > 12 μg/mL). Significant higher values were measured using the POC test ( < 0.001) for IFX results but no differences in ADL trough levels were observed ( = 0.3101). Spearman's correlation indicated a good correlation between the two assays (rs = 0.88 for ADL and rs = 0.93 for IFX), and McNemar's test revealed significant differences ( = 0.016) when classifying IFX samples between therapeutic and supra-therapeutic ranges but no significant differences were found among the other ranges for either IFX or ADL. These results show that we should be cautious when using these rapid measurement methods, and new targets should probably be defined for IFX when using this new analytical method.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic drug monitoring and immunogenetic factors associated with the use of adalimumab in Crohn's disease patients.

Genaro L, Carron J, de Castro M, Franceschini A, Lourenco G, Cruz C Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2025; 39:3946320251319379.

PMID: 39959979 PMC: 11831650. DOI: 10.1177/03946320251319379.


Potential Prognostic Protein Biomarkers in Tears From Noninfectious Uveitis Patients Under Biologic Treatment as a Prelude to Personalized Medicine.

Rodriguez-Martinez L, Rodriguez-Fernandez C, Rodriguez Lemos O, de Domingo B, Garcia Bru P, Mateos J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(13):29.

PMID: 39540857 PMC: 11572757. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.13.29.


Lateral flow test versus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to measure infliximab trough concentrations: A head-to-head comparison.

Bouhuys M, Wessels M, de Vries W, Lambeck A, Touw D, van Rheenen P J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024; 79(6):1134-1141.

PMID: 39390697 PMC: 11615136. DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.12372.

References
1.
Magro F, Afonso J, Lopes S, Coelho R, Goncalves R, Caldeira P . Clinical performance of an infliximab rapid quantification assay. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2017; 10(9):651-660. PMC: 5598812. DOI: 10.1177/1756283X17722916. View

2.
Dotan I, Ron Y, Yanai H, Becker S, Fishman S, Yahav L . Patient factors that increase infliximab clearance and shorten half-life in inflammatory bowel disease: a population pharmacokinetic study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014; 20(12):2247-59. DOI: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000212. View

3.
Dutzer D, Nasser Y, Berger A, Roblin X, Paul S . Letter: new thresholds need to be defined when using point of care assays to monitor infliximab trough levels in IBD patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018; 47(11):1571-1573. DOI: 10.1111/apt.14645. View

4.
Vande Casteele N, Herfarth H, Katz J, Falck-Ytter Y, Singh S . American Gastroenterological Association Institute Technical Review on the Role of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. Gastroenterology. 2017; 153(3):835-857.e6. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.07.031. View

5.
Tracey D, Klareskog L, Sasso E, Salfeld J, Tak P . Tumor necrosis factor antagonist mechanisms of action: a comprehensive review. Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 117(2):244-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2007.10.001. View