» Articles » PMID: 38003144

Aquarium Visitors Catch Some Rays: Rays Are More Active in the Presence of More Visitors

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2023 Nov 25
PMID 38003144
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Humans are a constant in the lives of captive animals, but the effects of human-animal interactions vary. Research on the welfare impacts of human-animal interactions focus predominantly on mammals, whereas fish have been overlooked. To address this lack of research, we assessed the impacts of aquarium visitors on the behaviors of ten members of four elasmobranch species: an Atlantic stingray (), four southern stingrays (), two blue-spotted maskrays (), and three fiddler rays (). The rays engaged in a significantly higher proportion of active behaviors and a lower proportion of inactive behaviors when visitor density levels were high; however, there were no significant changes for negative or social behaviors. Individual analyses indicated that all three fiddler rays and one of the southern stingrays' active behaviors differed across visitor density levels, whereas there was no association between active behavior and visitor density levels for the other rays. Further research is needed to determine whether this pattern is an adaptive or maladaptive response to visitors, but this research provides much needed initial data on activity budgets within elasmobranch species.

References
1.
Hosey G, Melfi V . Are we ignoring neutral and negative human-animal relationships in zoos?. Zoo Biol. 2014; 34(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21182. View

2.
Pierce S, Pardo S, Bennett M . Reproduction of the blue-spotted maskray Neotrygon kuhlii (Myliobatoidei: Dasyatidae) in south-east Queensland, Australia. J Fish Biol. 2010; 74(6):1291-308. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2009.02202.x. View

3.
Cox K, Brennan L, Gerwing T, Dudas S, Juanes F . Sound the alarm: A meta-analysis on the effect of aquatic noise on fish behavior and physiology. Glob Chang Biol. 2018; 24(7):3105-3116. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14106. View

4.
Anderson U, Benne M, Bloomsmith M, Maple T . Retreat space and human visitor density moderate undesirable behavior in petting zoo animals. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2003; 5(2):125-37. DOI: 10.1207/S15327604JAWS0502_03. View

5.
Sherwen S, Hemsworth P . The Visitor Effect on Zoo Animals: Implications and Opportunities for Zoo Animal Welfare. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(6). PMC: 6617010. DOI: 10.3390/ani9060366. View