» Articles » PMID: 38002799

Detection of Periodontal Bone Loss on Periapical Radiographs-A Diagnostic Study Using Different Convolutional Neural Networks

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2023 Nov 25
PMID 38002799
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Interest in machine learning models and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for diagnostic purposes is steadily increasing in dentistry. Here, CNNs can potentially help in the classification of periodontal bone loss (PBL). In this study, the diagnostic performance of five CNNs in detecting PBL on periapical radiographs was analyzed. A set of anonymized periapical radiographs ( = 21,819) was evaluated by a group of trained and calibrated dentists and classified into radiographs without PBL or with mild, moderate, or severe PBL. Five CNNs were trained over five epochs. Statistically, diagnostic performance was analyzed using accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Here, overall ACC ranged from 82.0% to 84.8%, SE 88.8-90.7%, SP 66.2-71.2%, and AUC 0.884-0.913, indicating similar diagnostic performance of the five CNNs. Furthermore, performance differences were evident in the individual sextant groups. Here, the highest values were found for the mandibular anterior teeth (ACC 94.9-96.0%) and the lowest values for the maxillary posterior teeth (78.0-80.7%). It can be concluded that automatic assessment of PBL seems to be possible, but that diagnostic accuracy varies depending on the location in the dentition. Future research is needed to improve performance for all tooth groups.

Citing Articles

Automatic Detection of Radiographic Alveolar Bone Loss in Bitewing and Periapical Intraoral Radiographs Using Deep Learning Technology: A Preliminary Evaluation.

AlGhaihab A, Moretti A, Reside J, Tuzova L, Huang Y, Tyndall D Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075823 PMC: 11899607. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050576.


Precision Medicine Assessment of the Radiographic Defect Angle of the Intrabony Defect in Periodontal Lesions by Deep Learning of Bitewing Radiographs.

Abu P, Mao Y, Lin Y, Chao C, Lin Y, Wang B Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1.

PMID: 39851317 PMC: 11760876. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010043.


Toward Digital Periodontal Health: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.

Soheili F, Delfan N, Masoudifar N, Ebrahimni S, Moshiri B, Glogauer M Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39329678 PMC: 11428937. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11090937.

References
1.
Li H, Zhou J, Zhou Y, Chen Q, She Y, Gao F . An Interpretable Computer-Aided Diagnosis Method for Periodontitis From Panoramic Radiographs. Front Physiol. 2021; 12:655556. PMC: 8258157. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.655556. View

2.
Kim J, Nam N, Shim J, Jung Y, Cho B, Hwang J . Transfer Learning via Deep Neural Networks for Implant Fixture System Classification Using Periapical Radiographs. J Clin Med. 2020; 9(4). PMC: 7230319. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9041117. View

3.
Widyaningrum R, Candradewi I, Aji N, Aulianisa R . Comparison of Multi-Label U-Net and Mask R-CNN for panoramic radiograph segmentation to detect periodontitis. Imaging Sci Dent. 2023; 52(4):383-391. PMC: 9807794. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20220105. View

4.
Chang H, Lee S, Yong T, Shin N, Jang B, Kim J . Deep Learning Hybrid Method to Automatically Diagnose Periodontal Bone Loss and Stage Periodontitis. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):7531. PMC: 7200807. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-64509-z. View

5.
Garnick J, Silverstein L . Periodontal probing: probe tip diameter. J Periodontol. 2000; 71(1):96-103. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2000.71.1.96. View