» Articles » PMID: 38002343

Novel Biomarkers and Advanced Cardiac Imaging in Aortic Stenosis: Old and New

Overview
Journal Biomolecules
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Nov 25
PMID 38002343
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Currently, the symptomatic status and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) play a crucial role in aortic stenosis (AS) assessment. However, the symptoms are often subjective, and LVEF is not a sensitive marker of left ventricle (LV) decompensation. Over the past years, the cardiac structure and function research on AS has increased due to advanced imaging modalities and potential therapies. New imaging parameters emerged as predictors of disease progression in AS. LV global longitudinal strain has proved useful for risk stratification in asymptomatic severe AS patients with preserved LVEF. The assessment of myocardial fibrosis by cardiac magnetic resonance is the most studied application and offers prognostic information on AS. Moreover, the usage of biomarkers in AS as objective measures of LV decompensation has recently gained more interest. The present review focuses on the transition from compensatory LV hypertrophy (H) to LV dysfunction and the biomarkers associated with myocardial wall stress, fibrosis, and myocyte death. Moreover, we discuss the potential impact of non-invasive imaging parameters for optimizing the timing of aortic valve replacement and provide insight into novel biomarkers for possible prognostic use in AS. However, data from randomized clinical trials are necessary to define their utility in daily practice.

References
1.
Spilias N, Martyn T, Denby K, Harb S, Popovic Z, Kapadia S . Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction in Aortic Stenosis: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, Management, and Future Directions. Struct Heart. 2023; 6(5):100089. PMC: 10242576. DOI: 10.1016/j.shj.2022.100089. View

2.
Lutz M, von Ingersleben N, Lambers M, Rosenberg M, Freitag-Wolf S, Dempfle A . Osteopontin predicts clinical outcome in patients after treatment of severe aortic stenosis with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Open Heart. 2017; 4(2):e000633. PMC: 5515168. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2017-000633. View

3.
Zhou K, Guo T, Xu Y, Guo R . Correlation Between Plasma Matrix Metalloproteinase-28 Levels and Severity of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis. Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26:e925260. PMC: 7526340. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.925260. View

4.
Zhang T, Xue Q, Zhu R, Jiang Y . Diagnostic Value of PICP and PIIINP in Myocardial Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2022; . DOI: 10.1002/clc.23901. View

5.
Flett A, Sado D, Quarta G, Mirabel M, Pellerin D, Herrey A . Diffuse myocardial fibrosis in severe aortic stenosis: an equilibrium contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 13(10):819-26. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jes102. View