» Articles » PMID: 38001933

Hydrodynamic and Hemodynamic Interactions in Chronic Hydrocephalus

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2023 Nov 25
PMID 38001933
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: During a cardiac cycle, intracranial pressure is related to arterial entry into the cranium and its interaction with intracranial compliance. The arterial inflow is compensated by intracranial compliance and, initially, the flushing of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) into the cervical subarachnoid spaces. Our objective is to analyze the interactions between intracranial arteriovenous exchange and cerebrospinal fluid oscillations.

Method: A total of 23 patients (73 ± 8 years) with suspected chronic hydrocephalus (CH) underwent an infusion test and phase-contrast MRI. Rout is an important factor in the diagnosis of CH. Patients were divided into 2 populations: (Rout: resistance to CSF outflow) (Rout > 12 mmHg/mL/min, 13 patients) and (Rout < 12 mmHg/mL/min, 10 patients). We measured the intracranial vascular volume (arteriovenous stroke volume: SV) and CSF (CSF stroke volume at upper cervical level: SV) volume variations during the cardiac cycle.

Results: In the whole population, we observed a significant correlation between SV and SV (R = 0.43; = 0.0007). In the population , this correlation was significant (R = 0.76; = 0.001). In the population , this correlation was not significant (R = 0.17, = 0.16).

Conclusions: These results show that the link between the compliance of the oscillating CSF and the abrupt arterial inflow seems to be altered in CH. CSF oscillations between intracranial and cervical fluid spaces limit the impact of the abrupt arterial inflow.

Citing Articles

Transmantle pressure under the influence of free breathing: non-invasive quantification of the aqueduct pressure gradient in healthy adults.

Liu P, Owashi K, Monnier H, Metanbou S, Capel C, Baledent O Fluids Barriers CNS. 2025; 22(1):1.

PMID: 39754238 PMC: 11697896. DOI: 10.1186/s12987-024-00612-x.


Quantifying CSF Dynamics disruption in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus using phase lag between transmantle pressure and volumetric flow rate.

Karki P, Sincomb S, Murphy M, Gunter J, Senjem M, Graff-Radford J Brain Multiphys. 2024; 7.

PMID: 39726610 PMC: 11671130. DOI: 10.1016/j.brain.2024.100101.


Impact of Shunt Placement on CSF Dynamics.

Capel C, Owashi K, Metanbou S, Peltier J, Baledent O Biomedicines. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38275381 PMC: 10813594. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12010020.

References
1.
Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Timofeev I, Lavinio A, Guazzo E, Hutchinson P . Intracranial pressure: more than a number. Neurosurg Focus. 2007; 22(5):E10. DOI: 10.3171/foc.2007.22.5.11. View

2.
Greitz D, Hannerz J, Rahn T, Bolander H, Ericsson A . MR imaging of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics in health and disease. On the vascular pathogenesis of communicating hydrocephalus and benign intracranial hypertension. Acta Radiol. 1994; 35(3):204-11. View

3.
Scollato A, Gallina P, Gautam B, Pellicano G, Cavallini C, Tenenbaum R . Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume in shunted patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30(8):1580-6. PMC: 7051622. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A1616. View

4.
Czosnyka Z, Owler B, Keong N, Santarius T, Baledent O, Pickard J . Impact of duration of symptoms on CSF dynamics in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurol Scand. 2010; 123(6):414-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2010.01420.x. View

5.
Bateman G . The pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: cerebral ischemia or altered venous hemodynamics?. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 29(1):198-203. PMC: 8119093. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0739. View