Characterizing Intubation Practices in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Survey of the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) Sites

Overview

Journal BMC Emerg Med

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Emergency Medicine

Date 2023 Nov 24

PMID 38001415

Authors

Muzeen Ismath

Holly Black

Carmen Hrymak

Rhonda J Rosychuk

Patrick Archambault

Patrick T Fok

Thomas Audet

Brenden Dufault

Corinne Hohl

Murdoch Leeies

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The risk of occupational exposure during endotracheal intubation has required the global Emergency Medicine (EM), Anesthesia, and Critical Care communities to institute new COVID- protected intubation guidelines, checklists, and protocols. This survey aimed to deepen the understanding of the changes in intubation practices across Canada by evaluating the pre-COVID-19, early-COVID-19, and present-day periods, elucidating facilitators and barriers to implementation, and understanding provider impressions of the effectiveness and safety of the changes made.

Methods: We conducted an electronic, self-administered, cross-sectional survey of EM physician site leads within the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN) to characterize and compare airway management practices in the pre-COVID-19, early-COVID-19, and present-day periods. Ethics approval for this study was obtained from the University of Manitoba Health Research Ethics Board. The electronic platform SurveyMonkey ( www.surveymonkey.com ) was used to collect and store survey tool responses. Categorical item responses, including the primary outcome, are reported as numbers and proportions. Variations in intubation practices over time were evaluated through mixed-effects logistic regression models.

Results: Invitations were sent to 33 emergency department (ED) physician site leads in the CCEDRRN. We collected 27 survey responses, 4 were excluded, and 23 analysed. Responses were collected in English (87%) and French (13%), from across Canada and included mainly physicians practicing in mainly Academic and tertiary sites (83%). All respondents reported that the intubation protocols used in their EDs changed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (100%, n = 23, 95% CI 0.86-1.00).

Conclusions: This study provides a novel summary of changes to airway management practices in response to the evolving COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. Information from this study could help inform a consensus on safe and effective emergent intubation of persons with communicable respiratory infections in the future.

References

Brown 3rd C, Bair A, Pallin D, Laurin E, Walls R . Improved glottic exposure with the Video Macintosh Laryngoscope in adult emergency department tracheal intubations. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 56(2):83-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.01.033. View

Huang J, Zeng J, Xie M, Huang X, Wei X, Pan L . How to perform tracheal intubation for COVID-19 patients safely and effectively: Experience AND tips from Sichuan, China. J Clin Anesth. 2020; 64:109800. PMC: 7132505. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109800. View

Brown 3rd C, Kaji A, Fantegrossi A, Carlson J, April M, Kilgo R . Video Laryngoscopy Compared to Augmented Direct Laryngoscopy in Adult Emergency Department Tracheal Intubations: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020; 27(2):100-108. DOI: 10.1111/acem.13851. View

Leeies M, Gershengorn H, Charbonney E, Kumar A, Fergusson D, Turgeon A . Intravenous immune globulin in septic shock: a Canadian national survey of critical care medicine and infectious disease specialist physicians. Can J Anaesth. 2021; 68(6):782-790. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-021-01941-3. View

Mark L, Lester L, Cover R, Herzer K . A Decade of Difficult Airway Response Team: Lessons Learned from a Hospital-Wide Difficult Airway Response Team Program. Crit Care Clin. 2018; 34(2):239-251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2017.12.008. View

Yao W, Wang T, Jiang B, Gao F, Wang L, Zheng H . Emergency tracheal intubation in 202 patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: lessons learnt and international expert recommendations. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125(1):e28-e37. PMC: 7151238. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.03.026. View

Cheung J, Ho L, Cheng J, Cham E, Lam K . Staff safety during emergency airway management for COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(4):e19. PMC: 7128208. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30084-9. View

Lynch J, Davitkov P, Anderson D, Bhimraj A, Cheng V, Guzman-Cottrill J . Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on Infection Prevention for Healthcare Personnel Caring for Patients with Suspected or Known COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis. 2021; . PMC: 8767890. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab953. View

Black H, Hall T, Hrymak C, Funk D, Siddiqui F, Sokal J . A prospective observational study comparing outcomes before and after the introduction of an intubation protocol during the COVID-19 pandemic. CJEM. 2022; 25(2):123-133. PMC: 9768405. DOI: 10.1007/s43678-022-00422-w. View

10.

Zhang L, Li J, Zhou M, Chen Z . Summary of 20 tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists for patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia: retrospective case series. J Anesth. 2020; 34(4):599-606. PMC: 7164839. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02778-8. View

11.

Tankard K, Sharifpour M, Chang M, Bittner E . Design and Implementation of Airway Response Teams to Improve the Practice of Emergency Airway Management. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(21). PMC: 9656324. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11216336. View

12.

Ahmad I, Jeyarajah J, Nair G, Ragbourne S, Vowles B, Wong D . A prospective, observational, cohort study of airway management of patients with COVID-19 by specialist tracheal intubation teams. Can J Anaesth. 2020; 68(2):196-203. PMC: 7472940. DOI: 10.1007/s12630-020-01804-3. View

13.

Kovacs G, Sowers N, Campbell S, French J, Atkinson P . Just the Facts: Airway management during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. CJEM. 2020; 22(4):440-444. PMC: 7203167. DOI: 10.1017/cem.2020.353. View

14.

Lundstrom L, Duez C, Norskov A, Rosenstock C, Thomsen J, Moller A . Effects of avoidance or use of neuromuscular blocking agents on outcomes in tracheal intubation: a Cochrane systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120(6):1381-1393. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.106. View

15.

Hohl C, Rosychuk R, McRae A, Brooks S, Archambault P, Fok P . Development of the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network population-based registry: a methodology study. CMAJ Open. 2021; 9(1):E261-E270. PMC: 8096396. DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20200290. View

16.

Wu C, Xia L, Li K, Ma W, Yu D, Qu B . High-flow nasal-oxygenation-assisted fibreoptic tracheal intubation in critically ill patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a prospective randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125(1):e166-e168. PMC: 7269901. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.02.020. View

17.

Griesdale D, Bosma T, Kurth T, Isac G, Chittock D . Complications of endotracheal intubation in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med. 2008; 34(10):1835-42. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1205-6. View

18.

Cubillos J, Querney J, Rankin A, Moore J, Armstrong K . A multipurpose portable negative air flow isolation chamber for aerosol-generating procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125(1):e179-e181. PMC: 7183948. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.04.059. View

19.

Kluge S, Janssens U, Welte T, Weber-Carstens S, Marx G, Karagiannidis C . German recommendations for critically ill patients with COVID‑19. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2020; 115(Suppl 3):111-114. PMC: 7155395. DOI: 10.1007/s00063-020-00689-w. View

20.

Leeies M, Rosychuk R, Ismath M, Xu K, Archambault P, Fok P . Intubation practices and outcomes for patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19: a national observational study by the Canadian COVID-19 Emergency Department Rapid Response Network (CCEDRRN). CJEM. 2023; 25(4):335-343. PMC: 10075161. DOI: 10.1007/s43678-023-00487-1. View