» Articles » PMID: 37999819

Newer Parameters of the Octreotide Test in Patients with Acromegaly

Overview
Journal Pituitary
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2023 Nov 24
PMID 37999819
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Predicting the therapeutic effects of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs) is important when assessing or planning effective treatment strategies in patients with acromegaly. The oft-used maximum growth hormone (GH) suppression rate parameter of the octreotide test has a suboptimal predictive value. Therefore, this study explored newer parameters of the octreotide test for predicting the therapeutic effect of long-acting fg-SRLs.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, the octreotide test parameters and the therapeutic effects of fg-SRL at 3 months were investigated in 45 consecutive treatment-naïve patients with acromegaly between April 2008 and March 2023. Additionally, the relationship between the octreotide test parameters and the therapeutic effects of fg-SRLs was investigated. Tumor shrinkage was evaluated based on changes in the longitudinal diameter of the macroadenomas. The area GH suppression rate-time under the curve (AUC) and the time to nadir GH level were calculated and compared with the maximum GH suppression rate.

Results: The AUC estimated reductions in serum insulin-like growth factor I, and tumor shrinkage. The time to nadir GH level predicted tumor shrinkage more robustly than the maximum GH suppression rate in patients with macroadenoma.

Conclusion: The AUC and time to nadir GH level may potentially be newer parameters of the octreotide test for estimating the therapeutic effect of fg-SRLs.

Citing Articles

Metyrapone single administration, as a possible predictive tool of its dosage and timing in Cushing's syndrome.

Tsujimoto Y, Yamamoto N, Bando H, Yamamoto M, Ohmachi Y, Motomura Y Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 15():1511155.

PMID: 39764253 PMC: 11700816. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1511155.

References
1.
Fleseriu M, Langlois F, Lim D, Varlamov E, Melmed S . Acromegaly: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022; 10(11):804-826. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00244-3. View

2.
Melmed S, Bronstein M, Chanson P, Klibanski A, Casanueva F, Wass J . A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018; 14(9):552-561. PMC: 7136157. DOI: 10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5. View

3.
Cuevas-Ramos D, Carmichael J, Cooper O, Bonert V, Gertych A, Mamelak A . A structural and functional acromegaly classification. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 100(1):122-31. PMC: 4283008. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-2468. View

4.
Carmichael J, Bonert V, Nuno M, Ly D, Melmed S . Acromegaly clinical trial methodology impact on reported biochemical efficacy rates of somatostatin receptor ligand treatments: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99(5):1825-33. PMC: 4010703. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-3757. View

5.
Gadelha M, Kasuki L, Korbonits M . Novel pathway for somatostatin analogs in patients with acromegaly. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2012; 24(5):238-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.tem.2012.11.007. View