The Reward-Related Shift of Emotional Contagion from the Observer's Perspective Correlates to Their Intimacy with the Expresser

Overview

Journal Behav Sci (Basel)

Date 2023 Nov 24

PMID 37998681

Authors

Ying Chen

Wenfeng Chen

Ling Zhang

Yanqiu Wei

Ping Hu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Although previous studies have found a bidirectional relationship between emotional contagion and reward, there is insufficient research to prove the effect of reward on the social function of emotional contagion. To explore this issue, the current study used electroencephalography (EEG) and the interactive way in which the expresser played games to help participants obtain reward outcomes. The results demonstrated a significant correlation between changes in emotional contagion and closeness, indicating that emotional contagion has a social regulatory function. Regarding the impact of reward outcomes, the results showed that compared to the context of a loss, in the context of a win, participants' closeness toward the expresser shifted to a more intimate level, their emotional contagion changed in a more positive direction, and the activity of the late positive component (LPC) of the event-related potentials (ERPs) changed to a greater extent. Significantly, the mediation results demonstrated the effect of reward and indicated that changes in the LPC elicited while experiencing the expressers' emotion predicted the subsequent shifts in closeness through alterations in emotional contagion of the anger emotion in the winning context and the happy emotion in the loss context. This study provides empirical evidence regarding the social function of emotional contagion and proves for the first time that the reward context plays a role in it.

References

Kozakevich Arbel E, Shamay-Tsoory S, Hertz U . Adaptive Empathy: Empathic Response Selection as a Dynamic, Feedback-Based Learning Process. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12:706474. PMC: 8339423. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.706474. View

Sims T, van Reekum C, Johnstone T, Chakrabarti B . How reward modulates mimicry: EMG evidence of greater facial mimicry of more rewarding happy faces. Psychophysiology. 2012; 49(7):998-1004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01377.x. View

Ibanez A, Melloni M, Huepe D, Helgiu E, Rivera-Rei A, Canales-Johnson A . What event-related potentials (ERPs) bring to social neuroscience?. Soc Neurosci. 2012; 7(6):632-49. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2012.691078. View

Hein G, Engelmann J, Vollberg M, Tobler P . How learning shapes the empathic brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 113(1):80-5. PMC: 4711838. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1514539112. View

Cui F, Ma N, Luo Y . Moral judgment modulates neural responses to the perception of other's pain: an ERP study. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:20851. PMC: 4749990. DOI: 10.1038/srep20851. View

Kret M, Akyuz R . Mimicry eases prediction and thereby smoothens social interactions. Cogn Emot. 2022; 36(5):794-798. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2110452. View

Zhang L, Chen W, Liu M, Ou Y, Xu E, Hu P . Light makeup decreases receivers' negative emotional experience. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):23802. PMC: 8664826. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03129-7. View

Korb S, Goldman R, Davidson R, Niedenthal P . Increased Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Decreased Zygomaticus Activation in Response to Disliked Smiles Suggest Top-Down Inhibition of Facial Mimicry. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:1715. PMC: 6677088. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01715. View

Kret M . Emotional expressions beyond facial muscle actions. A call for studying autonomic signals and their impact on social perception. Front Psychol. 2015; 6:711. PMC: 4443639. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00711. View

10.

Kuhn S, Muller B, van Baaren R, Wietzker A, Dijksterhuis A, Brass M . Why do I like you when you behave like me? Neural mechanisms mediating positive consequences of observing someone being imitated. Soc Neurosci. 2010; 5(4):384-92. DOI: 10.1080/17470911003633750. View

11.

Shamay-Tsoory S, Saporta N, Marton-Alper I, Gvirts H . Herding Brains: A Core Neural Mechanism for Social Alignment. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019; 23(3):174-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.002. View

12.

Uddin L . Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014; 16(1):55-61. DOI: 10.1038/nrn3857. View

13.

Meng J, Jackson T, Chen H, Hu L, Yang Z, Su Y . Pain perception in the self and observation of others: an ERP investigation. Neuroimage. 2013; 72:164-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.024. View

14.

Gable S . Approach and avoidance social motives and goals. J Pers. 2006; 74(1):175-222. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00373.x. View

15.

Hale J, F de C Hamilton A . Cognitive mechanisms for responding to mimicry from others. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016; 63:106-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.02.006. View

16.

Lougheed J, Brinberg M, Ram N, Hollenstein T . Emotion socialization as a dynamic process across emotion contexts. Dev Psychol. 2020; 56(3):553-565. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000801. View

17.

Van Kleef G, Cote S . The Social Effects of Emotions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2021; 73:629-658. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-010855. View

18.

Sarkheil P, Goebel R, Schneider F, Mathiak K . Emotion unfolded by motion: a role for parietal lobe in decoding dynamic facial expressions. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012; 8(8):950-7. PMC: 3831559. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nss092. View

19.

Swart J, Frobose M, Cook J, Geurts D, Frank M, Cools R . Catecholaminergic challenge uncovers distinct Pavlovian and instrumental mechanisms of motivated (in)action. Elife. 2017; 6. PMC: 5432212. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22169. View

20.

Salazar Kampf M, Liebermann H, Kerschreiter R, Krause S, Nestler S, Schmukle S . Disentangling the Sources of Mimicry: Social Relations Analyses of the Link Between Mimicry and Liking. Psychol Sci. 2017; 29(1):131-138. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617727121. View