» Articles » PMID: 37998654

About the Need for a More Adequate Way to Get an Understanding of the Experiencing of Aesthetic Items

Overview
Date 2023 Nov 24
PMID 37998654
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We live in times when neuroscientific methods have become standard methods that many researchers can easily use. While this offers excellent opportunities to understand brain activities linked with aesthetic processing, we face the problem of using sophisticated techniques without a proper and valid theoretical foundation of aesthetics. A further problem arises from sophisticated methods often demanding strict constraints in presenting and experiencing aesthetic stimuli. However, when experiencing aesthetic items, contextual factors matter, e.g., social and situational affordances are essential in triggering a true and deep "Kunsterlebnis" (Experience of Art). Additionally, in Art, it is often not the artwork as an object that matters but the close relationship and the processing the artwork. However, art is only one facet of the whole aesthetic domain, beside, e.g., design, architecture, everyday aesthetics, dance, literature, music, and opera. In the present paper, I propose a dynamic and holistic aesthetic perspective that includes the respective context, situation, cognitive and affective traits and state of the beholder, ongoing processes of understanding, Zeitgeist, and other cultural factors, which can be applied to different aesthetic domains. When ignoring such temporal and dynamic factors, we will not understand the qualia of aesthetic processing. These considerations might help researchers in the field of aesthetics to better understand the experiencing of aesthetic items of all kinds-if we ignore these factors, we are missing the essence of experiencing aesthetic items, especially artworks. We aim to sensitize and inform readers about these ideas to inspire a deeper understanding of experiencing aesthetic items and the advancement of a theoretical framework addressing the experiencing of aesthetics from different domains.

Citing Articles

Ecological decoding of visual aesthetic preference with oscillatory electroencephalogram features-A mini-review.

Welter M, Lotte F Front Neuroergon. 2024; 5:1341790.

PMID: 38450005 PMC: 10914990. DOI: 10.3389/fnrgo.2024.1341790.

References
1.
Pelowski M, Markey P, Lauring J, Leder H . Visualizing the Impact of Art: An Update and Comparison of Current Psychological Models of Art Experience. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:160. PMC: 4844603. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160. View

2.
Carbon C, Ditye T . Sustained effects of adaptation on the perception of familiar faces. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010; 37(3):615-25. DOI: 10.1037/a0019949. View

3.
Reber R, Schwarz N, Winkielman P . Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004; 8(4):364-82. DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3. View

4.
Blijlevens J, Carbon C, Mugge R, Schoormans J . Aesthetic appraisal of product designs: independent effects of typicality and arousal. Br J Psychol. 2012; 103(1):44-57. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02038.x. View

5.
Goldie K, Cumming D, Voropai D, Mosahebi A, Fabi S, Carbon C . Aesthetic Delusions: An Investigation into the Role of Rapid Visual Adaptation in Aesthetic Practice. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021; 14:1079-1087. PMC: 8424431. DOI: 10.2147/CCID.S305976. View