» Articles » PMID: 37998609

Postural Control Measurements to Predict Future Motor Impairment in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Nov 24
PMID 37998609
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Preterm infants are more likely to demonstrate developmental delays than fullterm infants. Postural measurement tools may be effective in measuring the center of pressure (COP) and asymmetry, as well as predicting future motor impairment. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate existing evidence regarding use of pressure mats or force plates for measuring COP and asymmetry in preterm infants, to determine how measures differ between preterm and fullterm infants and if these tools appropriately predict future motor impairment. The consulted databases included PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CINAHL. The quality of the literature and the risk of bias were assessed utilizing the ROB2: revised Cochrane risk-of bias tool. Nine manuscripts met the criteria for review. The postural control tools included were FSA UltraThin seat mat, Conformat Pressure-Sensitive mat, Play and Neuro-Developmental Assessment, and standard force plates. Studies demonstrated that all tools were capable of COP assessment in preterm infants and support the association between the observation of reduced postural complexity prior to the observation of midline head control as an indicator of future motor delay. Postural measurement tools provide quick and objective measures of postural control and asymmetry. Based on the degree of impairment, these tools may provide an alternative to standardized assessments that may be taxing to the preterm infant, inaccessible to therapists, or not sensitive enough to capture motor delays.

Citing Articles

Can Clinical Assessment of Postural Control Explain Locomotive Body Function, Mobility, Self-Care and Participation in Children with Cerebral Palsy?.

Vlckova B, Halamka J, Muller M, Sanz-Mengibar J, Safarova M Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38201004 PMC: 10779062. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010098.

References
1.
Kakebeeke T, von Siebenthal K, Largo R . Movement quality in preterm infants prior to term. Biol Neonate. 1998; 73(3):145-54. DOI: 10.1159/000013971. View

2.
Kniaziew-Gomoluch K, Szopa A, Kidon Z, Siwiec A, Domagalska-Szopa M . Design and Construct Validity of a Postural Control Test for Pre-Term Infants. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(1). PMC: 9818709. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010096. View

3.
McCarty D, Letzkus L, Attridge E, Dusing S . Efficacy of Therapist Supported Interventions from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit to Home: A Meta-Review of Systematic Reviews. Clin Perinatol. 2023; 50(1):157-178. DOI: 10.1016/j.clp.2022.10.004. View

4.
Pierrat V, Marchand-Martin L, Arnaud C, Kaminski M, Resche-Rigon M, Lebeaux C . Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BMJ. 2017; 358:j3448. PMC: 5558213. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j3448. View

5.
Noble Y, Boyd R . Neonatal assessments for the preterm infant up to 4 months corrected age: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011; 54(2):129-39. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03903.x. View