» Articles » PMID: 37998111

Assessment of the Penetration of an Endodontic Sealer into Dentinal Tubules with Three Different Compaction Techniques Using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy

Abstract

Adequate root canal sealing is essential for the success of endodontic treatment. There are numerous techniques available; identifying simple and efficient techniques is important to provide good patient care. The purpose of the study was to compare the maximum penetration depth and the percentage of sealant penetration of an endodontic sealer into dentine tubules using cold lateral condensation, continuous wave, and hybrid techniques, and to contrast the effectiveness of two different tapered gutta-percha master cones (0.02 and 0.04). A sample of sixty single root teeth was used. Six experimental groups were formed from the three filling techniques and the two tapered master cones. Images were acquired using a confocal laser scanning microscope. In the apical root third, the penetration percentage was higher in the hybrid compared with the continuous wave technique. The results indicated a higher penetration depth of hybrid compared with cold lateral condensation in the middle and coronal thirds, and in the apical third, a higher penetration was identified in the hybrid group compared with the continuous wave group. No significant differences in penetration were found comparing 0.02 with 0.04 taper gutta-percha groups. The coronal cross-sections presented a higher penetration than the apical third sections. In conclusion, the hybrid technique a had higher maximum sealer penetration than the continuous wave in the apical third, and the coronal third hybrid and continuous wave had a higher penetration than cold lateral condensation.

Citing Articles

Comparative Assessment of Push-Out Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Different Calcium-Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.

Merfea M, Cimpean S, Chiorean R, Antoniac A, Delean A, Badea I Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727454 PMC: 11675060. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120397.

References
1.
Gordon M, Love R, Chandler N . An evaluation of .06 tapered gutta-percha cones for filling of .06 taper prepared curved root canals. Int Endod J. 2005; 38(2):87-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00903.x. View

2.
Peters O, Paque F . Root canal preparation of maxillary molars with the self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. J Endod. 2010; 37(1):53-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.047. View

3.
Haupt F, Pult J, Hulsmann M . Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Shaping Ability of 3 Reciprocating Single-File Nickel-Titanium Systems on Single- and Double-Curved Root Canals. J Endod. 2020; 46(8):1130-1135. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.005. View

4.
Romania C, Beltes P, Boutsioukis C, Dandakis C . Ex-vivo area-metric analysis of root canal obturation using gutta-percha cones of different taper. Int Endod J. 2009; 42(6):491-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01533.x. View

5.
Karatekin A, Keles A, Gencoglu N . Comparison of continuous wave and cold lateral condensation filling techniques in 3D printed simulated C-shape canals instrumented with Reciproc Blue or Hyflex EDM. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0224793. PMC: 6871781. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224793. View