» Articles » PMID: 37998097

Aortic Valve Calcium Score by Computed Tomography As an Adjunct to Echocardiographic Assessment-A Review of Clinical Utility and Applications

Overview
Journal J Imaging
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Nov 24
PMID 37998097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is increasing in prevalence due to the aging population, and severe AS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Echocardiography remains the mainstay for the initial detection and diagnosis of AS, as well as for grading of severity. However, there are important subgroups of patients, for example, patients with low-flow low-gradient or paradoxical low-gradient AS, where quantification of severity of AS is challenging by echocardiography and underestimation of severity may delay appropriate management and impart a worse prognosis. Aortic valve calcium score by computed tomography has emerged as a useful clinical diagnostic test that is complimentary to echocardiography, particularly in cases where there may be conflicting data or clinical uncertainty about the degree of AS. In these situations, aortic valve calcium scoring may help re-stratify grading of severity and, therefore, further direct clinical management. This review presents the evolution of aortic valve calcium score by computed tomography, its diagnostic and prognostic value, as well as its utility in clinical care.

Citing Articles

Diagnostic Challenges in the Management of Aortic Valve Stenosis and the Role of Imaging: A Narrative Review.

Karelas D, Tatsis E, Oikonomidis D, Papadopoulos C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004761 PMC: 11856245. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041231.


Shaping the Optimal Timing for Treatment of Isolated Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis with Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction: The Role of Non-Invasive Diagnostics Focused on Strain Echocardiography and Future Perspectives.

DellAngela L, Nicolosi G J Imaging. 2025; 11(2).

PMID: 39997550 PMC: 11856064. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging11020048.


Association between triglyceride-glucose-body mass index and risk of aortic stenosis progression in patients with non-severe aortic stenosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Guo Z, Xiong Z, He L, Zhang S, Xu X, Chen G Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025; 24(1):46.

PMID: 39881345 PMC: 11780774. DOI: 10.1186/s12933-025-02579-x.

References
1.
Boskovski M, Gleason T . Current Therapeutic Options in Aortic Stenosis. Circ Res. 2021; 128(9):1398-1417. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318040. View

2.
Clavel M, Dumesnil J, Capoulade R, Mathieu P, Senechal M, Pibarot P . Outcome of patients with aortic stenosis, small valve area, and low-flow, low-gradient despite preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 60(14):1259-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.054. View

3.
Otto C, Kuusisto J, REICHENBACH D, Gown A, OBrien K . Characterization of the early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic stenosis. Histological and immunohistochemical studies. Circulation. 1994; 90(2):844-53. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.90.2.844. View

4.
Pawade T, Clavel M, Tribouilloy C, Dreyfus J, Mathieu T, Tastet L . Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 11(3):e007146. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146. View

5.
Ren X, Zhang M, Liu K, Hou Z, Gao Y, Yin W . The significance of aortic valve calcification in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 32(3):471-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0783-y. View