Comparison of Non-invasive Diagnostic Modalities for Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia at a Tertiary Hospital, South Africa
Overview
Affiliations
Aims: The aim of the study is to assess non-invasive diagnostic modalities for ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) when compared to histology.
Methods: A prospective case-control study was conducted of patients presenting with conjunctival masses at a tertiary eye hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Patients completed an interview and had three non-invasive diagnostic tests: optical coherence tomography, impression cytology and methylene blue stain. A biopsy with histology was performed as the gold standard to confirm the diagnosis.
Results: One hundred and eighty-two conjunctival masses of 175 patients were evaluated. There were 135 lesions identified as OSSN on biopsy and 47 lesions were benign on histology. Optical coherence tomography had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.2% (95% CI: 80.0-92.5) and 75.6% (95% CI: 60.5-87.1), respectively, when an epithelial thickness cutoff of 140 um was used. Shadowing was found in 46% of cases due to leukoplakia or increased thickness of the mass. Cytology had a sensitivity of 72.4% (95% CI: 62.5-81.0) and a specificity of 74.3% (95% CI: 56.7-87.5). Twenty-seven per cent of cytology specimens were excluded from analysis due to inadequate cellularity. Methylene blue had a high sensitivity of 91.9% (95% CI: 85.9-95.9), but low specificity of 55.3% (95% CI: 40.1-69.8).
Conclusion: Optical coherence tomography had a high sensitivity and specificity as a non-invasive test and liquid-based cytology performed well but had a lower sensitivity and specificity than with optical coherence tomography. Methylene blue performed well as a screening test, with a high sensitivity but low specificity.
Ou S, Lin Y, Zhang Y, Shi K, Wu H Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1388156.
PMID: 39421442 PMC: 11484446. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1388156.
Sinha S, Ramesh P, Nishant P, Morya A, Prasad R World J Methodol. 2024; 14(2):92267.
PMID: 38983656 PMC: 11229874. DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v14.i2.92267.