Peripheral Bone Removal Versus Sequential Drilling Protocol in Dental Implant Surgery: A 5-Year Retrospective Study

Overview

Journal Eur J Dent

Publisher Thieme

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2023 Nov 23

PMID 37995726

Authors

Faaiz Yaqub Alhamdani

Ahmad Fliah Hassan

Hashim Mueen Hussein

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the immediate success rate between peripheral bone removal (PBR) and conventional sequential drilling protocols.

Materials And Methods: Biographic data of 130 Iraqi patients who attended a private dental implant center in Baghdad between January 7, 2018 and February 30, 2023 were collected. During this period, 198 dental implant procedures were completed. The recorded data included the zone of implantation, immediate or delayed implant, sinus lift procedure, dental implant system, bone augmentation, and dental implant length and diameter.

Statistical Analysis: SPSS Ver. 25 was used for statistical analysis. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were applied.

Results: In total, 198 dental implant procedures were performed during the study period. Of these, 104 cases were treated with the PBR protocol and 94 with the conventional drilling protocol. Out of 130 patients included in this study, 70 were treated with the PBR (IBS) technique and 60 patients were treated with the conventional dental implant systems. The early success of osseointegration reported in this study for all of the cases exceeded 93%. The PBR protocol was successful in 96 cases (92.3%), whereas early success of osseointegration in patients treated with the conventional protocol was reported in 89 cases (94.7%). The chi-squared test showed no statistically significant difference in the early success rate between the two dental implant protocols ( = 0.575).

Conclusion: In terms of immediate success, the PBR technique appears to be a reliable drilling technique. However, further longitudinal studies need to explore its potential to replace the sequential drilling protocol.

References

Nilawati N, Widyastuti W, Rizka Y, Kurniawan H . Dental Implant Osseointegration Inhibition by Nicotine through Increasing nAChR, NFATc1 Expression, Osteoclast Numbers, and Decreasing Osteoblast Numbers. Eur J Dent. 2022; 17(4):1189-1193. PMC: 10756838. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758794. View

Ericson D . What is minimally invasive dentistry?. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2005; 2 Suppl 1:287-92. View

Chrcanovic B, Kisch J, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A . Factors Influencing Early Dental Implant Failures. J Dent Res. 2016; 95(9):995-1002. DOI: 10.1177/0022034516646098. View

Baqain Z, Moqbel W, Sawair F . Early dental implant failure: risk factors. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 50(3):239-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.04.074. View

Albrektsson T, Branemark P, Hansson H, Lindstrom J . Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981; 52(2):155-70. DOI: 10.3109/17453678108991776. View

Karalashvili L, Kakabadze A, Uhryn M, Vyshnevska H, Ediberidze K, Kakabadze Z . BONE GRAFTS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF BONE DEFECTS (REVIEW). Georgian Med News. 2018; (282):44-49. View

Guazzi P, Grandi T, Grandi G . Implant site preparation using a single bur versus multiple drilling steps: 4-month post-loading results of a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2015; 8(3):283-90. View

Kang D, Kim M, Lee S, Cho I, Shin H, Caballe-Serrano J . Early implant failure: a retrospective analysis of contributing factors. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2019; 49(5):287-298. PMC: 6819696. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.5.287. View

Elias C, Meirelles L . Improving osseointegration of dental implants. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2010; 7(2):241-56. DOI: 10.1586/erd.09.74. View

10.

Ustun Y, Erdogan O, Kurkcu M, Akova T, Damlar I . Effects of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on dental implant osseointegration: a preliminary report. Eur J Dent. 2009; 2(4):254-62. PMC: 2634779. View

11.

Gehrke S, Calvo Guirado J, Bettach R, Fabbro M, Perez-Albacete Martinez C, Shibli J . Evaluation of the insertion torque, implant stability quotient and drilled hole quality for different drill design: an in vitro Investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016; 29(6):656-662. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12808. View

12.

McKenna G, Gjengedal H, Harkin J, Holland N, Moore C, Srinivasan M . EFFECT OF AUTOGENOUS BONE GRAFT SITE ON DENTAL IMPLANT SURVIVAL AND DONOR SITE COMPLICATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022; 22(3):101731. DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101731. View

13.

French D, Larjava H, Ofec R . Retrospective cohort study of 4591 Straumann implants in private practice setting, with up to 10-year follow-up. Part 1: multivariate survival analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014; 26(11):1345-54. DOI: 10.1111/clr.12463. View

14.

Olmedo-Gaya M, Manzano-Moreno F, Canaveral-Cavero E, Luna-Del Castillo J, Vallecillo-Capilla M . Risk factors associated with early implant failure: A 5-year retrospective clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2015; 115(2):150-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.07.020. View

15.

Gehrke S, Bettach R, Aramburu Junior J, Prados-Frutos J, Fabbro M, Shibli J . Peri-Implant Bone Behavior after Single Drill versus Multiple Sequence for Osteotomy Drill. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:9756043. PMC: 5925187. DOI: 10.1155/2018/9756043. View

16.

Marheineke N, Scherer U, Rucker M, von See C, Rahlf B, Gellrich N . Evaluation of accuracy in implant site preparation performed in single- or multi-step drilling procedures. Clin Oral Investig. 2017; 22(5):2057-2067. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-017-2312-y. View

17.

Jang H, Kang J, Lee K, Lee Y, Park P . A retrospective study on related factors affecting the survival rate of dental implants. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012; 3(4):204-15. PMC: 3259446. DOI: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.4.204. View

18.

Zhang Z, Meng T, Chen Q, Liu W, Chen Y . [Retrospective analysis of early dental implant failure]. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018; 50(6):1088-1091. View

19.

Moraschini V, Poubel L, Ferreira V, Barboza E . Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014; 44(3):377-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.10.023. View

20.

Geckili O, Bilhan H, Geckili E, Cilingir A, Mumcu E, Bural C . Evaluation of possible prognostic factors for the success, survival, and failure of dental implants. Implant Dent. 2013; 23(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3182a5d430. View