» Articles » PMID: 37995724

Innovative Alveolar Ridge Preservation Surgical Technique with Immediate Dental Implant Placement: A Retrospective Case Report of 1-Year Follow-Up

Overview
Journal Eur J Dent
Publisher Thieme
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Nov 23
PMID 37995724
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Following tooth extraction, the alveolar ridge undergoes morphological and dimensional changes, including a clot formation that is gradually replaced by granulation tissue. Studies indicate that both horizontal and vertical ridge dimensions decrease after extraction; however, these changes can be mitigated through grafting with biomaterials and barrier membranes. Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques are employed to counteract bone resorption postextraction, encompassing periosteal inhibition and modified periosteal inhibition (MPI) techniques. The Degidi clot chamber technique offers a means to achieve biomaterial-free extraction sockets, promoting healing and osteointegration. This study aims to present the first rehabilitation of a postextraction dental implant in the maxilla using an innovative ARP procedure via a MPI technique. The technique does not involve autologous or heterologous grafting materials; instead, a cortical lamina and a customized screw are used in conjunction with the blood clot. The primary objective is to protect the vestibular cortical bone from preosteoclastic aggression, which can trigger bone resorption. The technique employs a 0.5-mm cortical lamina to mechanically shield the vestibular cortical bone, preventing vestibular cortical bone resorption and increasing its thickness without the need for biomaterial insertion, relying on the blood clot. The effectiveness of the technique was assessed through a 12-month postimplantation cone-beam computed tomography scan, revealing a 0.5-mm increase. Although based on a single case, the 1-year follow-up results are promising, and further studies are warranted to validate the technique's efficacy.

Citing Articles

Management of Vestibular Bone Fenestration with Periosteal Inhibition (PI) Technique During Alveolar Socket Preservation: A Case Report.

Grassi A, Bizzoca M, De Biasi L, Padula R, Annicchiarico C, Cervino G Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768796 PMC: 11678057. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60121912.


Comparison of Aesthetic, Mechanical Outcome, and Bone Loss in Angulated Screw Channels (ASCs) and Cement-Retained Implant-Supported Prosthesis: A Case-Control Study.

Rella E, De Angelis P, Papetti L, Damis G, Gasparini G, DAddona A Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39195077 PMC: 11353712. DOI: 10.3390/dj12080233.

References
1.
Festa V, Addabbo F, Laino L, Femiano F, Rullo R . Porcine-derived xenograft combined with a soft cortical membrane versus extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical study in humans. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011; 15(5):707-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00398.x. View

2.
Christensen G . Ridge preservation: why not?. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996; 127(5):669-70. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1996.0279. View

3.
Barone A, Ricci M, Tonelli P, Santini S, Covani U . Tissue changes of extraction sockets in humans: a comparison of spontaneous healing vs. ridge preservation with secondary soft tissue healing. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 24(11):1231-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02535.x. View

4.
Montemezzi P, Ferrini F, Pantaleo G, Gherlone E, Cappare P . Dental Implants with Different Neck Design: A Prospective Clinical Comparative Study with 2-Year Follow-Up. Materials (Basel). 2020; 13(5). PMC: 7084739. DOI: 10.3390/ma13051029. View

5.
Van der Weijden F, DellAcqua F, Slot D . Alveolar bone dimensional changes of post-extraction sockets in humans: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2009; 36(12):1048-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01482.x. View