» Articles » PMID: 37994631

Structure-decoupled Functional Connectome-based Brain Age Prediction Provides Higher Association to Cognition

Overview
Journal Neuroreport
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Nov 23
PMID 37994631
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Brain age prediction as well as the prediction difference has been well examined to be a potential biomarker for brain disease or abnormal aging process. However, less knowledge was reported for the cognitive association within normal population. In this study, we proposed a novel approach to brain age prediction by structure-decoupled functional connectome. The original functional connectome was decomposed and decoupled into a structure-decoupled functional connectome using structural connectome harmonics. Our method was applied to a large dataset of normal aging individuals and achieved a high correlation between predicted and chronological age (r = 0.77). Both the original FC and structure-decoupled FC could be well-trained in a brain age prediction model. Significant remarkable relationships between the brain age prediction difference (predicted age minus chronological age) and cognitive scores were discovered. However, the brain age-predicted difference driven by structure-decoupled FC showed a stronger correction to the two cognitive scores (MMSE: r = -0.27, P -value = 0.002; MoCA: r = -0.32, P -value = 0.0003). Our findings suggest that our structure-decoupled functional connectivity approach could provide a more individual-specific functional network, leading to improved brain age prediction performance and a better understanding of cognitive decline in aging.

References
1.
Saad Z, Reynolds R, Jo H, Gotts S, Chen G, Martin A . Correcting brain-wide correlation differences in resting-state FMRI. Brain Connect. 2013; 3(4):339-52. PMC: 3749702. DOI: 10.1089/brain.2013.0156. View

2.
Preti M, Van De Ville D . Decoupling of brain function from structure reveals regional behavioral specialization in humans. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):4747. PMC: 6800438. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12765-7. View

3.
Murphy K, Birn R, Handwerker D, Jones T, Bandettini P . The impact of global signal regression on resting state correlations: are anti-correlated networks introduced?. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(3):893-905. PMC: 2750906. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.036. View

4.
Oschwald J, Guye S, Liem F, Rast P, Willis S, Rocke C . Brain structure and cognitive ability in healthy aging: a review on longitudinal correlated change. Rev Neurosci. 2019; 31(1):1-57. PMC: 8572130. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2018-0096. View

5.
Yang Z, Zhu H, Kong K, Wu X, Chen J, Li P . The dynamic transmission of positional information in mutants during embryogenesis. Elife. 2020; 9. PMC: 7332292. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.54276. View