» Articles » PMID: 37993897

A Clinical Strategy to Improve the Diagnostic Performance of 3T Non-contrast Coronary MRA and Noninvasively Evaluate Coronary Distensibility: Combination of Diastole and Systole Imaging

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 Nov 23
PMID 37993897
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The clinical application of coronary MR angiography (MRA) combining diastole and systole imaging has never been described comprehensively in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. We aimed to design an optimal non-contrast coronary MRA scan protocol combining diastolic and systolic imaging and to (1) evaluate its diagnostic performance for detecting significant coronary stenosis; (2) evaluate the feasibility of this protocol to noninvasively measure the coronary distensibility index (CDI).

Methods: From June 2021 to May 2022, 33 healthy volunteers and 91 suspected CAD patients scheduled for X-ray coronary angiography (CAG) were prospectively enrolled. 3T non-contrast water-fat coronary MRA was carried out twice at diastole and systole. Significant coronary stenosis was defined as a luminal diameter reduction of ≥ 50% using CAG as the reference and was evaluated as follows: (1) by coronary MRA in diastole alone; (2) by coronary MRA in systole alone; (3) by combined coronary MRA in diastole and systole. According to CAG, the patients were divided into significant CAD patients and non-significant CAD patients. The difference in CDI among participants was evaluated.

Results: Combined coronary MRA was completed in 31 volunteers and 76 patients. The per-patient sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of combined coronary MRA were 97.5%, 83.3%, and 90.8%, respectively. Compared with single diastolic mode, combined coronary MRA showed equally high sensitivity but improved specificity on a per-patient basis (83.3% vs. 63.9%, adjusted P = 0.013). The CDI tested by coronary MRA decreased incrementally from healthy volunteers to non-significant and significant CAD patients.

Conclusion: Compared with single-phase mode, 3 T non-contrast combined coronary MRA significantly improved specificity and may have potential to be a simple noninvasive method to measure CDI.

Citing Articles

LncRNA LUCAT1 offers protection against human coronary artery endothelial cellular oxidative stress injury through modulating hsa-miR-6776-5p/LRRC25 axis and activating autophagy flux.

Wang Y, Zhang X, Ren M, He S, Bie H, Duan M J Transl Med. 2024; 22(1):1171.

PMID: 39741278 PMC: 11686991. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05966-2.


Image navigator-based, automated coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary artery stenosis.

Wood G, Hajhosseiny R, Pedersen A, Littlewood S, Hansen T, Neji R J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024; 26(2):101097.

PMID: 39293786 PMC: 11647470. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101097.

References
1.
Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N, Ishida M, Nagata M, Ichikawa Y . Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56(12):983-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.071. View

2.
He Y, Pang J, Dai Q, Fan Z, An J, Li D . Diagnostic Performance of Self-navigated Whole-Heart Contrast-enhanced Coronary 3-T MR Angiography. Radiology. 2016; 281(2):401-408. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152514. View

3.
Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C . 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2019; 41(3):407-477. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425. View

4.
Al-Mallah M, Nasir K, Katz R, Takasu J, Lima J, Bluemke D . Thoracic aortic distensibility and thoracic aortic calcium (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis [MESA]). Am J Cardiol. 2010; 106(4):575-80. PMC: 4228943. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.03.074. View

5.
Maldonado J, Pereira T, Polonia J, Silva J, Morais J, Marques M . Arterial stiffness predicts cardiovascular outcome in a low-to-moderate cardiovascular risk population: the EDIVA (Estudo de DIstensibilidade VAscular) project. J Hypertens. 2011; 29(4):669-75. DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283432063. View