» Articles » PMID: 37993796

A Consensus Statement on Minimum Operational Standards for Geriatric Emergency Care in Belgium: a Modified Delphi Study

Overview
Journal BMC Geriatr
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2023 Nov 22
PMID 37993796
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: As emergency department (ED) leaders started integrating geriatric emergency guidelines on a facultative basis, important variations have emerged between EDs in care for older patients. The aim of this study was to establish a consensus on minimum operational standards for Geriatric ED care in Belgium.

Methods: A two-stage modified Delphi study was conducted. Twenty panellists were recruited from Dutch and French speaking regions in Belgium to join an interdisciplinary expert panel. In the first stage, an online survey was conducted to identify and define all possible elements of geriatric emergency care. In the second stage, an online survey and online expert panel meeting were organized consecutively to determine which elements should be recognized as minimum operational standards.

Results: Between March 2020 and February 2021, the expert panel developed a broad consensus including ten statements focusing on the target population, specific goals, availability of geriatric practitioners and quality assurance. Additionally, the expert panel also determined which protocols, materials and accommodation criteria should be available in conventional EDs (39 standards) and in observational EDs (57 standards).

Conclusions: This study presents a consensus on minimum operational standards for geriatric emergency care in two ED types: the conventional ED and the observational ED. These findings may serve as a starting point towards broadly supported minimum standards of care stipulated by legislation in Belgium or other countries.

Citing Articles

Do guidelines improve geriatric emergency care?.

van Oppen J, Heeren P Eur Geriatr Med. 2024; 15(5):1277-1279.

PMID: 39406975 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-024-01050-6.

References
1.
Junger S, Payne S, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley S . Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med. 2017; 31(8):684-706. DOI: 10.1177/0269216317690685. View

2.
Kennedy M, Lesser A, Israni J, Liu S, Santangelo I, Tidwell N . Reach and Adoption of a Geriatric Emergency Department Accreditation Program in the United States. Ann Emerg Med. 2021; 79(4):367-373. PMC: 10015385. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.06.013. View

3.
Mooijaart S, Lucke J, Brabrand M, Conroy S, Nickel C . Geriatric emergency medicine: time for a new approach on a European level. Eur J Emerg Med. 2019; 26(2):75-76. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000594. View

4.
Carpenter C, Mooijaart S . Geriatric Screeners 2.0: Time for a Paradigm Shift in Emergency Department Vulnerability Research. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020; 68(7):1402-1405. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16502. View

5.
Veugelers R, Gaakeer M, Patka P, Huijsman R . Improving design choices in Delphi studies in medicine: the case of an exemplary physician multi-round panel study with 100% response. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020; 20(1):156. PMC: 7294633. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-020-01029-4. View