» Articles » PMID: 37990674

Deciphering the Protein-DNA Code of Bacterial Winged Helix-turn-helix Transcription Factors

Overview
Journal Quant Biol
Publisher Wiley
Date 2023 Nov 22
PMID 37990674
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Sequence-specific binding by transcription factors (TFs) plays a significant role in the selection and regulation of target genes. At the protein:DNA interface, amino acid side-chains construct a diverse physicochemical network of specific and non-specific interactions, and seemingly subtle changes in amino acid identity at certain positions may dramatically impact TF:DNA binding. Variation of these specificity-determining residues (SDRs) is a major mechanism of functional divergence between TFs with strong structural or sequence homology.

Methods: In this study, we employed a combination of high-throughput specificity profiling by SELEX and Spec-seq, structural modeling, and evolutionary analysis to probe the binding preferences of winged helix-turn-helix TFs belonging to the OmpR sub-family in .

Results: We found that OmpR paralogs recognize tandem, variably spaced repeats composed of "GT-A" or "GCT"-containing half-sites. Some divergent sequence preferences observed within the "GT-A" mode correlate with amino acid similarity; conversely, "GCT"-based motifs were observed for a subset of paralogs with low sequence homology. Direct specificity profiling of a subset of OmpR homologues (CpxR, RstA, and OmpR) as well as predicted "SDR-swap" variants revealed that individual SDRs may impact sequence preferences locally through direct contact with DNA bases or distally via the DNA backbone.

Conclusions: Overall, our work provides evidence for a common structural code for sequence-specific wHTH:DNA interactions, and demonstrates that surprisingly modest residue changes can enable recognition of highly divergent sequence motifs. Further examination of SDR predictions will likely reveal additional mechanisms controlling the evolutionary divergence of this important class of transcriptional regulators.

Citing Articles

Exploring the mono-/bistability range of positively autoregulated signaling systems in the presence of competing transcription factor binding sites.

Gao R, Brokaw S, Li Z, Helfant L, Wu T, Malik M PLoS Comput Biol. 2022; 18(11):e1010738.

PMID: 36413575 PMC: 9725139. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010738.


The ArcAB Two-Component System: Function in Metabolism, Redox Control, and Infection.

Brown A, Anderson M, Bachman M, Mobley H Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2022; 86(2):e0011021.

PMID: 35442087 PMC: 9199408. DOI: 10.1128/mmbr.00110-21.

References
1.
Marino Buslje C, Teppa E, Di Domenico T, Delfino J, Nielsen M . Networks of high mutual information define the structural proximity of catalytic sites: implications for catalytic residue identification. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010; 6(11):e1000978. PMC: 2973806. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000978. View

2.
Yamamoto K, Ishihama A . Characterization of copper-inducible promoters regulated by CpxA/CpxR in Escherichia coli. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2006; 70(7):1688-95. DOI: 10.1271/bbb.60024. View

3.
Capra E, Perchuk B, Lubin E, Ashenberg O, Skerker J, Laub M . Systematic dissection and trajectory-scanning mutagenesis of the molecular interface that ensures specificity of two-component signaling pathways. PLoS Genet. 2010; 6(11):e1001220. PMC: 2991266. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001220. View

4.
He X, Wang S . DNA consensus sequence motif for binding response regulator PhoP, a virulence regulator of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemistry. 2014; 53(51):8008-20. PMC: 4283936. DOI: 10.1021/bi501019u. View

5.
Kenney L . Structure/function relationships in OmpR and other winged-helix transcription factors. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2002; 5(2):135-41. DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5274(02)00310-7. View