» Articles » PMID: 37989966

Keratinized Tissue Augmentation Using Collagen-based Soft Tissue Substitute With/without Epidermal Growth Factor on Buccally Positioned Implants: a Pilot Preclinical Study

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Nov 22
PMID 37989966
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the effect of epithelial growth factor (EGF) with collagen matrix (CM) on the gain of KT for buccally positioned implants in dogs.

Materials And Methods: In five dogs, four implants were placed buccally with the whole part of KT excision on the buccal side (two implants per each hemi-mandible). After one month, KT augmentation was performed: 1) free gingival grafts (FGG), 2) collagen matrix (CM) only, 3) CM soaked with 1 μg/g of EGF, and 4) CM soaked with 10 μg/g of EGF (n = 5 in each group). The experimental animals were sacrificed three months post-KT augmentation. Clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric analyses were performed.

Results: The clinical KT zone was the highest in group FGG (5.16 ± 1.63 mm). Histologically, all groups presented buccal bony dehiscence. Regarding newly formed KT, no specific difference was found among the groups, but robust rete pegs formation in some specimens in group FGG. Histomorphometric KT height (4.66 ± 1.81 mm) and length (5.56 ± 2.25 mm) were the highest in group FGG, whereas similar increases were noted in the rest. The buccal soft tissue thickness at the coronal part of the implant did not exceed 2 mm in all groups.

Conclusion: All groups presented increased KT zone, but FGG treatment was more favored. The addition of EGF to CM appeared not to enhance KT formation.

Clinical Relevance: FGG treatment was more favorable to re-establish the KT zone than other treatment modalities.

Citing Articles

Preclinical Investigation on the Effect of Collagen Matrix With Polydeoxyribonucleotide at Buccally Positioned Implants.

Kim C, Hong J, Shin S, Shin S, Chung J, Thoma D Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2024; 27(1):e13411.

PMID: 39462883 PMC: 11789838. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13411.

References
1.
Bouri Jr A, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani M, Faddoul F, Nouneh I . Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008; 23(2):323-6. View

2.
Boynuegri D, Nemli S, Kasko Y . Significance of keratinized mucosa around dental implants: a prospective comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012; 24(8):928-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02475.x. View

3.
Oh S, Ji C, Azad S . Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting a lack of keratinized mucosa: Extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2020; 47(6):777-785. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13272. View

4.
Oh S, Masri R, Williams D, Ji C, Romberg E . Free gingival grafts for implants exhibiting lack of keratinized mucosa: a prospective controlled randomized clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2016; 44(2):195-203. DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12660. View

5.
Yoo H, Park J, Ko Y . Evaluation of health screening data for factors associated with peri-implant bone loss. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2022; 52(6):509-521. PMC: 9807850. DOI: 10.5051/jpis.2203620181. View