» Articles » PMID: 37989856

Placebo Hypoalgesia Induced by Operant Conditioning: a Comparative Study on the Effects of Verbal, Token-based, and Social Rewards and Punishers

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Nov 21
PMID 37989856
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Operant conditioning was shown to be a mechanism of placebo hypoalgesia; however, only verbal rewards and punishers were applied in the previous study. We aimed to induce placebo hypoalgesia using more clinically relevant consequences: token-based and social. Participants were divided into three experimental groups (with verbal, social, and token-based rewards and punishers); and two control groups (with and without placebo application). During operant conditioning, participants in the experimental groups received thermal stimuli of equal intensity and were rewarded for reporting lower pain and punished for reporting higher pain compared to their pretest pain levels. The control groups did not receive any consequences. Our results revealed placebo hypoalgesia was induced by operant conditioning only in the experimental groups with social and token-based reinforcement, compared to the control groups. The hypoalgesic effect found in the group that received verbal reinforcement did not differ significantly from the control group with the placebo application. Moreover, expectations about upcoming pain intensity were found to be a mediator, and the number of reinforcers received during conditioning was a predictor of placebo hypoalgesia. These findings highlight the potential benefits of incorporating token-based and social consequences for optimizing treatment outcomes in pain management.

Citing Articles

"The Dark Side of Musculoskeletal Care": Why Do Ineffective Techniques Seem to Work? A Comprehensive Review of Complementary and Alternative Therapies.

Mamud-Meroni L, Tarcaya G, Carrasco-Uribarren A, Rossettini G, Flores-Cortes M, Ceballos-Laita L Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002804 PMC: 11853516. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020392.

References
1.
Kirsch I, Kong J, Sadler P, Spaeth R, Cook A, Kaptchuk T . Expectancy and Conditioning in Placebo Analgesia: Separate or Connected Processes?. Psychol Conscious (Wash D C). 2014; 1(1):51-59. PMC: 4118664. DOI: 10.1037/cns0000007. View

2.
Testa M, Rossettini G . Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: How contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther. 2016; 24:65-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2016.04.006. View

3.
Jepma M, Wager T . Conceptual Conditioning: Mechanisms Mediating Conditioning Effects on Pain. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26(11):1728-39. PMC: 4646733. DOI: 10.1177/0956797615597658. View

4.
Blythe J, Thomaidou M, Peerdeman K, van Laarhoven A, Van Schothorst M, Veldhuijzen D . Placebo effects on cutaneous pain and itch: a systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental results and methodology. Pain. 2023; 164(6):1181-1199. PMC: 10184563. DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002820. View

5.
Bieniek H, Babel P . The Effect of the Model's Social Status on Placebo Analgesia Induced by Social Observational Learning. Pain Med. 2021; 23(1):81-88. PMC: 8723154. DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnab299. View