» Articles » PMID: 3798590

[Arthrolysis of the Elbow Joint]

Overview
Journal Unfallchirurgie
Specialty Critical Care
Date 1986 Oct 1
PMID 3798590
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Promising results can be achieved in arthrolysis of the elbow joint in case of a strictly observed indication and if the intervention is carried out by an experienced surgeon. The problems of motivation in case of an existing indication are described. Only a motivated patient will be capable to cooperate to such an extent as is necessary for the postoperative follow-up treatment. Good results are subject to three conditions: the performance of the surgeon, i.e. the intervention itself, cooperation, and follow-up under medical supervision. This last point is especially important for the therapy result, because at present several health insurances have formed the opinion that after the operation the patient shall be abmitted for example to a physiotherapeutic institute without constant medical control. This is just the way which produces deleterious results especially following to arthrolysis, but also after all other accident surgeries and in particular after joint operations.

Citing Articles

Arthrolysis for post-traumatic stiffness of the elbow.

Boerboom A, de Meyier H, Verburg A, Verhaar J Int Orthop. 1993; 17(6):346-9.

PMID: 8163307 DOI: 10.1007/BF00180451.

References
1.
Rojczyk M, Reilmann H . [Arthrolysis as treatment of posttraumatic and postoperative stiffness of the knee- and elbow joint (author's transl)]. Unfallheilkunde. 1980; 83(12):599-605. View

2.
Oyemade G . Fascial arthroplasty for elbow ankylosis. Int Surg. 1983; 68(1):81-4. View

3.
Schlein A . Semiconstrained total elbow arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976; (121):222-9. View

4.
Kimura C, VAINIO K . Arthroplasty of the elbow in rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1976; 84(3):339-48. DOI: 10.1007/BF00416092. View

5.
KLEMS H, Weigert M . [Results of arthrolyses on the knee and elbow joints]. Arch Orthop Unfallchir. 1972; 73(3):211-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF01880730. View