Giving and Receiving Help Among Persons Entering Sober Living Houses

Overview

Journal Alcohol Treat Q

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2023 Nov 20

PMID 37982020

Authors

Douglas L Polcin

Elizabeth Mahoney

Meenakshi Subbaraman

Amy A Mericle

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Giving and receiving help are integral to creating the social environments necessary to support recovery. However, studies assessing the effects of helping behaviors have focused primarily on the benefits derived from giving help to others in 12-step programs and treatment. The current study examined the frequency of giving and receiving help among 188 persons entering sober living houses (SLHs), a type of recovery home that is common in California. Helping was assessed in three contexts: the SLH, 12-step meetings they attended, and interactions with their family and friends. Residents who gave help to others in one of these contexts tended to also receive help in that context. Residents who reported giving or receiving help in one context tended to report giving and receiving help in other contexts. Study findings suggest helping in recovery occurs in a broader, more reciprocal manner than currently conceptualized. Studies should address how giving and receiving help in different contexts affects recovery outcomes. Research is also needed to describe the determinants of giving and receiving help. Considerations for facilitating help among SLH residents are described.

References

Kaskutas L, Ammon L, Oberste E, Polcin D . A brief scale for measuring helping activities in recovery: the brief helper therapy scale. Subst Use Misuse. 2007; 42(11):1767-81. DOI: 10.1080/10826080701208608. View

Polcin D, Mericle A, Howell J, Sheridan D, Christensen J . Maximizing social model principles in residential recovery settings. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2014; 46(5):436-43. PMC: 4220294. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2014.960112. View

Polcin D, Mahoney E, Mericle A . House Manager Roles in Sober Living Houses. J Subst Use. 2021; 26(2):151-155. PMC: 7958703. DOI: 10.1080/14659891.2020.1789230. View

Zemore S, Kaskutas L . 12-step involvement and peer helping in day hospital and residential programs. Subst Use Misuse. 2008; 43(12-13):1882-903. DOI: 10.1080/10826080802297534. View

Polcin D, Korcha R, Bond J, Galloway G . Eighteen Month Outcomes for Clients Receiving Combined Outpatient Treatment and Sober Living Houses. J Subst Use. 2011; 15(5):352-366. PMC: 3008818. DOI: 10.3109/14659890903531279. View

Zemore S, Pagano M . Kickbacks from helping others: health and recovery. Recent Dev Alcohol. 2009; 18:141-66. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77725-2_9. View

Mericle A, Slaymaker V, Gliske K, Ngo Q, Subbaraman M . The role of recovery housing during outpatient substance use treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021; 133:108638. PMC: 8748296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108638. View

Polcin D, Mahoney E, Mericle A . Psychometric Properties of the Recovery Home Environment Scale. Subst Use Misuse. 2021; 56(8):1161-1168. PMC: 8159864. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1910710. View

Borkman T, Kaskutas L, Room J, Bryan K, Barrows D . An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1998; 15(1):7-17. DOI: 10.1016/s0740-5472(97)00244-4. View

10.

Pagano M, Friend K, Tonigan J, Stout R . Helping other alcoholics in alcoholics anonymous and drinking outcomes: findings from project MATCH. J Stud Alcohol. 2005; 65(6):766-73. PMC: 3008319. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2004.65.766. View

11.

Graham B, Jason L, Ferrari J . Sense of Community within Oxford House Recovery Housing: Impact of Resident Age and Income. J Groups Addict Recover. 2010; 4(1-2):62-70. PMC: 2909140. DOI: 10.1080/15560350802712405. View

12.

McLellan A, Kushner H, Metzger D, Peters R, Smith I, Grissom G . The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992; 9(3):199-213. DOI: 10.1016/0740-5472(92)90062-s. View

13.

Mericle A, Hemberg J, Stall R, Carrico A . Pathways to Recovery: Recovery housing models for men who have sex with men (MSM). Addict Res Theory. 2019; 27(5):373-382. PMC: 6581469. DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2018.1538409. View

14.

Moskowitz D, Vittinghoff E, Schmidt L . Reconsidering the effects of poverty and social support on health: a 5-year longitudinal test of the stress-buffering hypothesis. J Urban Health. 2012; 90(1):175-84. PMC: 3579301. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-012-9757-8. View

15.

Pagano M, Zemore S, Onder C, Stout R . Predictors of initial AA-related helping: findings from project MATCH. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009; 70(1):117-25. PMC: 2629624. DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2009.70.117. View

16.

Schwartz C, Meisenhelder J, Ma Y, Reed G . Altruistic social interest behaviors are associated with better mental health. Psychosom Med. 2003; 65(5):778-85. DOI: 10.1097/01.psy.0000079378.39062.d4. View

17.

Humphreys K, Kaskutas L, Weisner C . The Alcoholics Anonymous Affiliation Scale: development, reliability, and norms for diverse treated and untreated populations. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1998; 22(5):974-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03691.x. View

18.

Polcin D, Korcha R, Bond J, Galloway G . Sober living houses for alcohol and drug dependence: 18-month outcomes. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010; 38(4):356-65. PMC: 2860009. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.02.003. View

19.

Wittman F, Polcin D . The Evolution of Peer Run Sober Housing as a Recovery Resource for California Communities. Int J Self Help Self Care. 2014; 8(2):157-187. PMC: 4248351. DOI: 10.2190/SH.8.2.c. View

20.

Polcin D, Korcha R . Housing Status, Psychiatric Symptoms, and Substance Abuse Outcomes Among Sober Living House Residents over 18 Months. Addict Disord Their Treat. 2017; 16(3):138-150. PMC: 5646694. DOI: 10.1097/ADT.0000000000000105. View