» Articles » PMID: 37978081

Third Time's a Charm: Band to Sleeve to Bypass

Overview
Journal Surg Endosc
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Nov 17
PMID 37978081
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Adjustable gastric bands (AGB) are frequently converted to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) due to weight recurrence or band complications. Such conversions carry a higher-risk than primary procedures. Some patients undergo two conversions-from AGB to SG, and subsequently from SG to RYGB. This presents a unique situation with limited literature on indications and complication rates associated with these double conversions.

Methods: We examined the 2020-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) Participant Use File to evaluate conversions from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. Patient and operative characteristics, along with outcomes, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were applied.

Results: We identified 276 patients who underwent a conversion from AGB to SG and then to RYGB. The primary reason for the second conversion (SG to RYGB) was gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) at 55.1%, followed by inadequate weight loss or weight regain (IWL/WR) at 36.9%. The remaining reasons included dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, or others. Patients converted for IWL/WR demonstrated a higher baseline body mass index and prevalence of sleep apnea compared to other cohorts (both p < 0.001). Meanwhile, patients in the "other reasons" group had the highest rate of open surgical approaches (9.1%) and concurrent lysis of adhesions (p = 0.001 and p = 0.022), with correspondingly higher rates of anastomotic leak, reoperations, serious complications, and mortality.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing double conversions (AGB to SG to RYGB) do so primarily for GERD or IWL/WR. Further research is required to better define the optimal primary operation for each patient, aiming to reduce the necessity for multiple conversions.

Citing Articles

Revisional Bariatric Surgery After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Bile Reflux: a Single-Center Long-Term Cohort Study.

Hage K, Sawma T, Jawhar N, Bartosiak K, Vargas E, Abu Dayyeh B Obes Surg. 2024; 34(7):2420-2430.

PMID: 38861123 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07355-6.


From Bands to Bypasses: Navigating Safety of Band Conversions to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Single Anastomosis Duodenoileostomy Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Shin T, Medhati P, Dang J, Wasden K, Sheu E, Tavakkoli A Obes Surg. 2024; 34(7):2627-2633.

PMID: 38837020 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07340-z.

References
1.
Felsenreich D, Artemiou E, Steinlechner K, Vock N, Jedamzik J, Eichelter J . Fifteen Years After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Weight Loss, Remission of Associated Medical Problems, Quality of Life, and Conversions to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-Long-Term Follow-Up in a Multicenter Study. Obes Surg. 2021; 31(8):3453-3461. PMC: 8270807. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05475-x. View

2.
Altieri M, Yang J, Telem D, Meng Z, Frenkel C, Halbert C . Lap band outcomes from 19,221 patients across centers and over a decade within the state of New York. Surg Endosc. 2015; 30(5):1725-32. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4402-8. View

3.
Clapp B, Ponce J, DeMaria E, Ghanem O, Hutter M, Kothari S . American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2020 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022; 18(9):1134-1140. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.06.284. View

4.
Clapp B, Harper B, Dodoo C, Klingsporn W, Barrientes A, Cutshall M . Trends in revisional bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database 2015-2017. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020; 16(7):908-915. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.03.002. View

5.
Fulton C, Sheppard C, Birch D, Karmali S, de Gara C . A comparison of revisional and primary bariatric surgery. Can J Surg. 2017; 60(3):205-211. PMC: 5453764. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.006116. View