» Articles » PMID: 37974223

Comparison of Simulation and Video-based Training for Acute Asthma

Abstract

Background: Emergency medicine is particularly well suited to simulation training. However, evidence for the efficacy of simulation-based medical training remains limited especially to manage high-risk cases such as acute asthma.

Objective: The objective of our study was to compare the performance of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) and interactive video-case challenge-based training (IVC) for final-year medical students in the management of acute asthma.

Methods: This was a prospective randomized controlled study conducted at the emergency department (ED) of Monastir University hospital ( Tunisia). 69 final-year medical students were randomized to HFS (n = 34) and IVC (n = 35) training on acute asthma topic. The study was conducted over a 1-week period. Efficacy of each teaching method was compared through the use of multiple-choice questionnaires (MCQ) before (pre-test), after (post-test) training and a simulation scenario test conducted 1 week later. The scenario was based on acute asthma management graded on predefined critical actions using two scores: the checklist clinical score (range 0 to 30), and the team skills score (range 0 to 16). Student satisfaction was also evaluated with the Likert 5 points scale. Two years after the post-test, both groups underwent a third MCQ testing to assess sustainability of knowledge.

Results: There were no differences in age between groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the HFS and IVC groups pre-test scores (p = 0.07). Both groups demonstrated improvement in MCQ post-test from baseline after training session; the HFS MCQ post-test score increased significantly more than the IVC score (p < 0.001). The HFS group performed better than the IVC group on the acute asthma simulation scenario (p < 0.001). Mean checklist clinical score and mean team skills score were significantly higher in HFS group compared to IVC group (respectively 22.9 ± 4.8 and 11.5 ± 2.5 in HFS group vs 19.1 ± 3 and 8.4 ± 3.1 in IVC group) (p < 0.001). After 2 years, MCQ post-test scores decreased in both groups but the decrease was lower in HFS group compared to the IVC group.

Conclusion: High-fidelity simulation-based training was superior to interactive video-case challenge for teaching final year medical students,and led to more long-term knowledge retention in the management of simulated acute asthma patients.

Trial Registration: The study was registered at www.

Clinicaltrials: gov NCT02776358 on 18/05/2016.

Citing Articles

Assessing Team Performance in a Longitudinal Neonatal Resuscitation Simulation Training Program: Comparing Validity Evidence to Select the Best Tool.

Soghikian S, Chipman M, Holmes J, Calhoun A, Mallory L Cureus. 2024; 16(9):e68810.

PMID: 39371693 PMC: 11456317. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.68810.


Development of a Clinical Simulation Video to Evaluate Multiple Domains of Clinical Competence: Cross-Sectional Study.

Shikino K, Nishizaki Y, Fukui S, Yokokawa D, Yamamoto Y, Kobayashi H JMIR Med Educ. 2024; 10:e54401.

PMID: 38421691 PMC: 10940988. DOI: 10.2196/54401.

References
1.
Al-Elq A . Simulation-based medical teaching and learning. J Family Community Med. 2011; 17(1):35-40. PMC: 3195067. DOI: 10.4103/1319-1683.68787. View

2.
Lewis R, Strachan A, Smith M . Is high fidelity simulation the most effective method for the development of non-technical skills in nursing? A review of the current evidence. Open Nurs J. 2012; 6:82-9. PMC: 3415625. DOI: 10.2174/1874434601206010082. View

3.
Brennan N, Corrigan O, Allard J, Archer J, Barnes R, Bleakley A . The transition from medical student to junior doctor: today's experiences of Tomorrow's Doctors. Med Educ. 2010; 44(5):449-58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03604.x. View

4.
King J, Reising D . Teaching advanced cardiac life support protocols: the effectiveness of static versus high-fidelity simulation. Nurse Educ. 2011; 36(2):62-5. DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e31820b5012. View

5.
Murphy J, Torsher L, Dunn W . Simulation medicine in intensive care and coronary care education. J Crit Care. 2007; 22(1):51-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.01.003. View