» Articles » PMID: 37967641

Testing Interventions to Reduce Clinical Inertia in the Treatment of Hypertension: Rationale and Design of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Clinical inertia, or failure to intensify treatment when indicated, leads to suboptimal blood pressure control. Interventions to overcome inertia and increase antihypertensive prescribing have been modestly successful in part because their effectiveness varies based on characteristics of the provider, the patient, or the provider-patient interaction. Understanding for whom each intervention is most effective could help target interventions and thus increase their impact.

Methods: This three-arm, randomized trial tests the effectiveness of 2 interventions to reduce clinical inertia in hypertension prescribing compared to usual care. Forty five primary care providers (PCPs) caring for patients with hypertension in need of treatment intensification completed baseline surveys that assessed behavioral traits and were randomized to one of three arms: 1) Pharmacist e-consult, in which a clinical pharmacist provided patient-specific recommendations for hypertension medication management to PCPs in advance of upcoming visits, 2) Social norming dashboards that displayed PCP's hypertension control rates compared to those of their peers, or 3) Usual care (no intervention). The primary outcome was the rate of intensification of hypertension treatment. We will compare this outcome between study arms and then evaluate the association between characteristics of providers, patients, their clinical interactions, and intervention responsiveness.

Results: Forty-five primary care providers were enrolled and randomized: 16 providers and 173 patients in the social norming dashboards arm, 15 providers and 143 patients in the pharmacist e-consult arm, and 14 providers and 150 patients in the usual care arm. On average, the mean patient age was 64 years, 47% were female, and 73% were white. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of patients were similar across arms, with the exception of more Hispanic patients in the usual care arm and fewest in the pharmacist e-consult arm.

Conclusions: This study can help identify interventions to reduce inertia in hypertension care and potentially identify the characteristics of patients, providers, or patient-provider interactions to understand for whom each intervention would be most beneficial.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT, Registered: NCT04603560).

Citing Articles

Impact of Pharmacist Expertise on Acceptance Rates in a Comprehensive E-Consult Program within a Large Academic Health System.

Freed C, King C, Soltesz B, David Gothard M, Altabbaa B, Majstorovic A Innov Pharm. 2024; 15(3).

PMID: 39483508 PMC: 11524217. DOI: 10.24926/iip.v15i3.6278.


A Cross-Sectional Survey of Fixed-Dose Combination Antihypertensive Medicine Prescribing in Twenty-Four Countries, Including Qualitative Insights.

OHagan E, McIntyre D, Nguyen T, Tan K, Hanlon P, Siddiqui M Glob Heart. 2024; 19(1):73.

PMID: 39281000 PMC: 11396169. DOI: 10.5334/gh.1353.

References
1.
Luders S, Schrader J, Schmieder R, Smolka W, Wegscheider K, Bestehorn K . Improvement of hypertension management by structured physician education and feedback system: cluster randomized trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2009; 17(3):271-9. DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328330be62. View

2.
Schmittdiel J, Uratsu C, Karter A, Heisler M, Subramanian U, Mangione C . Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification. J Gen Intern Med. 2008; 23(5):588-94. PMC: 2324158. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0554-8. View

3.
Miller W, Crabtree B . Qualitative analysis: how to begin making sense. Fam Pract Res J. 1994; 14(3):289-97. View

4.
Tang M, Rhodes S, Powell R, McGowan L, Howarth E, Brown B . How effective are social norms interventions in changing the clinical behaviours of healthcare workers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Implement Sci. 2021; 16(1):8. PMC: 7792225. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01072-1. View

5.
Legros S, Cislaghi B . Mapping the Social-Norms Literature: An Overview of Reviews. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019; 15(1):62-80. PMC: 6970459. DOI: 10.1177/1745691619866455. View