A Table Tennis Serve Versus Rally Hit Elicits Differential Hemispheric Electrocortical Power Fluctuations

Overview

Journal J Neurophysiol

Publisher American Physiological Society

Specialties Neurology
Physiology

Date 2023 Nov 15

PMID 37964746

Authors

Amanda Studnicki

Rachael D Seidler

Daniel P Ferris

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Human visuomotor control requires coordinated interhemispheric interactions to exploit the brain's functional lateralization. In right-handed individuals, the left hemisphere (right arm) is better for dynamic control and the right hemisphere (left arm) is better for impedance control. Table tennis is a game that requires precise movements of the paddle, whole body coordination, and cognitive engagement, providing an ecologically valid way to study visuomotor integration. The sport has many different types of strokes (e.g., serve, return, and rally shots), which should provide unique cortical dynamics given differences in the sensorimotor demands. The goal of this study was to determine the hemispheric specialization of table tennis serving - a sequential, self-paced, bimanual maneuver. We used time-frequency analysis, event-related potentials, and functional connectivity measures of source-localized electrocortical clusters and compared serves with other types of shots, which varied in the types of movement required, attentional focus, and other task demands. We found greater alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (13-30 Hz) power in the right sensorimotor cortex than in the left sensorimotor cortex, and we found a greater magnitude of spectral power fluctuations in the right sensorimotor cortex for serve hits than return or rally hits, in all right-handed participants. Surprisingly, we did not find a difference in interhemispheric functional connectivity between a table tennis serve and return or rally hits, even though a serve could arguably be a more complex maneuver. Studying real-world brain dynamics of table tennis provides insight into bilateral sensorimotor integration. We found different spectral power fluctuations in the left and right sensorimotor cortices during table tennis serves, returns, and rallies. Our findings contribute to the basic science understanding of hemispheric specialization in a real-world context.

References

Fling B, Seidler R . Fundamental differences in callosal structure, neurophysiologic function, and bimanual control in young and older adults. Cereb Cortex. 2011; 22(11):2643-52. PMC: 3464417. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhr349. View

Crews D, Landers D . Electroencephalographic measures of attentional patterns prior to the golf putt. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993; 25(1):116-26. DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199301000-00016. View

Sergent J . The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation?. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1982; 8(2):253-72. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.8.2.253. View

Shim J, Kim S, Oh S, Kang N, Zatsiorsky V, Latash M . Plastic changes in interhemispheric inhibition with practice of a two-hand force production task: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Neurosci Lett. 2005; 374(2):104-8. PMC: 2826973. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.10.034. View

Sorensen V, Ingvaldsen R, Whiting H . The application of co-ordination dynamics to the analysis of discrete movements using table-tennis as a paradigm skill. Biol Cybern. 2001; 85(1):27-38. DOI: 10.1007/PL00007994. View

van Diepen R, Mazaheri A . The Caveats of observing Inter-Trial Phase-Coherence in Cognitive Neuroscience. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):2990. PMC: 5813180. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20423-z. View

Pfurtscheller G, Lopes da Silva F . Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles. Clin Neurophysiol. 1999; 110(11):1842-57. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00141-8. View

Lee S, Jin S, An J . The difference in cortical activation pattern for complex motor skills: A functional near- infrared spectroscopy study. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):14066. PMC: 6773684. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50644-9. View

Nordin A, Hairston W, Ferris D . Dual-electrode motion artifact cancellation for mobile electroencephalography. J Neural Eng. 2018; 15(5):056024. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aad7d7. View

10.

Pernet C, Appelhoff S, Gorgolewski K, Flandin G, Phillips C, Delorme A . EEG-BIDS, an extension to the brain imaging data structure for electroencephalography. Sci Data. 2019; 6(1):103. PMC: 6592877. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0104-8. View

11.

Heinrichs-Graham E, Kurz M, Gehringer J, Wilson T . The functional role of post-movement beta oscillations in motor termination. Brain Struct Funct. 2017; 222(7):3075-3086. PMC: 5610915. DOI: 10.1007/s00429-017-1387-1. View

12.

Verstynen T, Diedrichsen J, Albert N, Aparicio P, Ivry R . Ipsilateral motor cortex activity during unimanual hand movements relates to task complexity. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 93(3):1209-22. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00720.2004. View

13.

Rueda-Delgado L, Solesio-Jofre E, Serrien D, Mantini D, Daffertshofer A, Swinnen S . Understanding bimanual coordination across small time scales from an electrophysiological perspective. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014; 47:614-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.10.003. View

14.

Brantley J, Luu T, Nakagome S, Zhu F, L Contreras-Vidal J . Full body mobile brain-body imaging data during unconstrained locomotion on stairs, ramps, and level ground. Sci Data. 2018; 5:180133. PMC: 6038848. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2018.133. View

15.

Peterson S, Ferris D . Differentiation in Theta and Beta Electrocortical Activity between Visual and Physical Perturbations to Walking and Standing Balance. eNeuro. 2018; 5(4). PMC: 6088363. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0207-18.2018. View

16.

Klug M, Gramann K . Identifying key factors for improving ICA-based decomposition of EEG data in mobile and stationary experiments. Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 54(12):8406-8420. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14992. View

17.

Chettouf S, Rueda-Delgado L, de Vries R, Ritter P, Daffertshofer A . Are unimanual movements bilateral?. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020; 113:39-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.002. View

18.

Haaland K, Harrington D, Knight R . Neural representations of skilled movement. Brain. 2000; 123 ( Pt 11):2306-13. DOI: 10.1093/brain/123.11.2306. View

19.

Bernard J, Taylor S, Seidler R . Handedness, dexterity, and motor cortical representations. J Neurophysiol. 2010; 105(1):88-99. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00512.2010. View

20.

Onton J, Westerfield M, Townsend J, Makeig S . Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006; 30(6):808-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.007. View