» Articles » PMID: 37963607

Building Upon the Sugar Beverage Tax in Mexico: a Modelling Study of Tax Alternatives to Increase Benefits

Overview
Journal BMJ Glob Health
Specialty Public Health
Date 2023 Nov 14
PMID 37963607
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: In 2014, Mexico implemented a one peso-per-litre tax to sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB). Even though this tax reduced household purchases and predicted population health gains, the magnitude is lower compared with taxes implemented in other settings. In this study, we assessed what would happen if Mexico modified its existing tax to get higher benefits based on currently implemented taxes elsewhere.

Methods: For each tax scenario, we estimated net benefits as the difference between healthcare savings and lost jobs. We created hypothetical scenarios in which the current tax doubled or would be modified based on existing tax designs around the world including specific taxes (sugar-density or volumetric) and ad-valorem taxes.

Results: We found that the largest benefits would correspond to a tax increase of 7.4 Mexican pesos (0.45 US dollars (USD)) per SSB litre, following the current tax in Bahrain (the highest tax rate option). This tax is predicted to yield net benefits equivalent to USD 24.7 billion after 10 years of the tax redesign. We also found that sugar-density taxes can result in larger net benefits since, in addition to reductions in consumption associated with responses to prices, they induce product reformulation. Middle-income households are the most benefited group because they reported the highest baseline prevalence of obesity and the largest price elasticity.

Conclusion: Policymakers should consider pursuing a tax reform adding to the current tax, with significant increases in prices linked to a sugar-density strategy to reach a higher benefit.

Citing Articles

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet index is associated with lower diet costs in the Mexican population.

Aburto T, Salgado J, Rodriguez-Ramirez S, Rivera J, Barquera S, Batis C Nutr J. 2024; 23(1):108.

PMID: 39300464 PMC: 11414250. DOI: 10.1186/s12937-024-01002-7.

References
1.
Colchero M, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin B, Ng S . In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36(3):564-571. PMC: 5442881. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231. View

2.
Basto-Abreu A, Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Vidana-Perez D, Colchero M, Hernandez-F M, Hernandez-Avila M . Cost-Effectiveness Of The Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Excise Tax In Mexico. Health Aff (Millwood). 2019; 38(11):1824-1831. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05469. View

3.
Gracner T, Marquez-Padilla F, Hernandez-Cortes D . Changes in Weight-Related Outcomes Among Adolescents Following Consumer Price Increases of Taxed Sugar-Sweetened Beverages. JAMA Pediatr. 2021; 176(2):150-158. PMC: 8669601. DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.5044. View

4.
Batis C, Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Basto-Abreu A . Associated substitution and complementation patterns of processed discretionary foods and drinks on total energy and added sugar intake. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2023; 36(5):1942-1950. PMC: 10524537. DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13175. View

5.
Roche M, Alvarado M, Sandoval R, Da Silva Gomes F, Paraje G . Comparing taxes as a percentage of sugar-sweetened beverage prices in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022; 11:None. PMC: 9290324. DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100257. View